Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1737 / 2894 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1737 / 2894 Next Page
Page Background

291. Rubens FD, Mesana T: The inflammatory response

to cardiopulmonary bypass: A therapeutic overview.

Perfusion 19(Suppl 1)S5–S12, 2004.

292. Kirklin JW, Barratt-Boyes BG: Hypothermia, circu-

latory arrest, and cardiopulmonary bypass. In

Kirklin JW, Barratt-Boyes BG (eds): Cardiac

Surgery, 2nd ed. New York, Churchill Livingstone,

1993, pp 61–127.

293. Dorotta I, Kimball-Jones P, Applegate R: I.I. Deep

hypothermia and circulatory arrest in adults. Semin

Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 11:66–76, 2007.

294. Edmonds HL Jr, Rodriguez RA, Audenaert SM, et al:

The role of neuromonitoring in cardiovascular

surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 10:15–23, 1996.

295. Cook RC, Gao M, Macnab AJ, et al: Aortic arch

reconstruction: Safety of moderate hypothermia

and antegrade cerebral perfusion during systemic

circulatory arrest. J Card Surg 21:158–164, 2006.

296. Duebener LF, Sakamoto T, Hatsuoka S, et al: Effects

of hematocrit on cerebral microcirculation and

tissue oxygenation during deep hypothermic

bypass. Circulation 104:I260–I264, 2001.

297. Jonassen AE, Quaegebeur JM, Young WL: Cerebral

blood flow velocity in pediatric patients is reduced

after cardiopulmonary bypass with profound hypo-

thermia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110:934–943,

1995.

298. Li Z, Yang L, Jackson M, et al: Increased pressure

during retrograde cerebral perfusion in an acute

porcine model improves brain tissue perfusion

without increase in tissue edema. Ann Thorac Surg

73:1514–1521, 2002.

299. Di Eusanio M, Ciano M, Labriola G, et al: Cannula-

tion of the innominate artery during surgery of the

thoracic aorta: Our experience in 55 patients. Eur J

Cardiothorac Surg 32:270–273, 2007.

300. Gega A, Rizzo JA, Johnson MH, et al: Straight deep

hypothermic arrest: Experience in 394 patients

supports its effectiveness as a sole means of brain

preservation. Ann Thorac Surg 84:759–766, 2007.

301. Harrington DK, Fragomeni F, Bonser RS: Cerebral

perfusion. Ann Thoras Surg 83:S799–804, 2007.

302. Boudoulas H, Rittgers SE, Lewis RP, et al: Changes

in diastolic time with various pharmacologic agents:

Implication for myocardial perfusion. Circulation

60:164–169, 1979.

303. London M, Mittnacht A, Kaplan JA: Anesthesia for

myocardial revascularization. In Kaplan JA (ed):

Kaplan’s Cardiac Anesthesia. Philadelphia, Saunders

Elsevier, 2006, pp 585–643.

304. Okum G, Horrow JC: Anesthetic management of

myocardial revascularization. In Hensley FA,

Martin DE, Gravlee GP (eds): A Practical Approach

to Cardiac Anesthesia. Philadelphia, Lippincott

Williams & Wilkins, 2008, pp 299–315.

305. Puskas JD, Kilgo PD, Kutner M, et al: Off-pump

techniques disproportionately benefit women and

narrow the gender disparity in outcomes after coro-

nary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 116:I192–

I199, 2007.

306. Mack M, Bachand D, Acuff T, et al: Improved outco-

mes in coronary artery bypass grafting with bea-

ting-heart techniques. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

124:598–607, 2002.

307. Grundeman PF, Borst C, van Herwaarden JA, et al:

Vertical displacement of the beating heart by the

octopus tissue stabilizer: Influence on coronary

flow. Ann Thorac Surg 65:1348–1352, 1998.

308. Grundeman PF, Borst C, Verlaan CW, et al: Expo-

sure of circumflex branches in the tilted, beating

porcine heart: Echocardiographic evidence of right

ventricular deformation and the effect of right or

left heart bypass. JThorac Cardiovasc Surg 118:316–

323, 1999.

309. George SJ, Al-Ruzzeh S, Amrani M: Mitral annulus

distortion during beating heart surgery: A potential

cause for hemodynamic disturbance—a three-di-

mensional echocardiography reconstruction study.

Ann Thorac Surg 73:1424–1430, 2002.

310. Mishra M, Shrivastava S, Dhar A, et al: A prospec-

tive evaluation of hemodynamic instability during

off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardio-

thorac Vasc Anesth 17:452–458, 2003.

311. Nierich AP, Diephuis J, Jansen EW, et al: Heart

displacement during off-pump CABG: How well

is it tolerated? Ann Thorac Surg 70:466–472,

2000.

312. Mathison M, Edgerton JR, Horswell JL, et al: Analy-

sis of hemodynamic changes during beating heart

surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1355–

1360, 2000.

313. Chassot PG, van der Linden P, Zaugg M, et al: Off-

pump coronary artery bypass surgery: Physiology

and anaesthetic management. Br J Anaesth 92:400–

413, 2004.

314. Mack MJ, Pfister A, Bachand D, et al: Comparison

of coronary bypass surgery with and without car-

diopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel

disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:167–173,

2004.

315. Patel NC, Patel NU, Loulmet DF, et al: Emergency

conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass during

attempted off-pump revascularization results in

increased morbidity and mortality. JThorac Cardio-

vasc Surg 128:655–661, 2004.

316. Racz MJ, Hannan EL, IsomOW, et al: A comparison

of short- and long-term outcomes after off-pump

and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery

with sternotomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:557–564,

2004.

317. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, et al: A randomized

comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel

coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med

350:21–28, 2004.

318. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al: Off-

pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass graf-

ting: Early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and

quality-of-life outcomes: A randomized trial. JAMA

291:1841–1849, 2004.

319. Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Djaiani G, et al: Off-

pump coronary artery surgery for reducing morta-

lity and morbidity: Meta-analysis of randomized

and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol

46:872–882, 2005.

320. Lim E, Drain A, Davies W, et al: A systematic review

of randomized trials comparing revascularization

rate and graft patency of off-pump and conventio-

nal coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

132:1409–1413, 2006.

321. Puskas JD, Edwards FH, Pappas PA, et al: Off-pump

techniques benefit men and women and narrow the

disparity in mortality after coronary bypass graf-

ting. Ann Thorac Surg 84:1447–1454, 2007.

322. Holzhey DM, Jacobs S, Mochalski M, et al: Seven-

year follow-up after minimally invasive direct coro-

nary artery bypass: Experience with more than 1300

patients. Ann Thorac Surg 83:108–114, 2007.

323. Thiele H, Oettel S, Jacobs S, et al: Comparison of

bare-metal stenting with minimally invasive bypass

surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending

coronary artery: A 5-year follow-up. Circulation

112:3445–3450, 2005.

324. Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, et al: Comparison of

stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for

stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary

artery. N Engl J Med 347:561–566, 2002.

325. Cisowski M, Drzewiecki J, Drzewiecka-Gerber A, et

al: Primary stenting versus MIDCAB: Preliminary

report—Comparison of two methods of revascula-

rization in single left anterior descending coronary

artery stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1334–S1339,

2002.

326. Drenth DJ, Veeger NJ, Winter JB, et al: A prospective

randomized trial comparing stenting with off-

pump coronary surgery for high-grade stenosis in

the proximal left anterior descending coronary

artery: Three-year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol

40:1955–1960, 2002.

327. Zimrin D, Reyes PA, Reicher B, et al: A hybrid alter-

native for high risk left main disease. Catheter Car-

diovasc Interv 69:123–127, 2007.

328. Katz MR, Van Praet F, de Canniere D, et al: Integra-

ted coronary revascularization: Percutaneous coro-

nary intervention plus robotic totally endoscopic

coronary artery bypass. Circulation 114:I473–I476,

2006.

329. Otto CM: Valvular heart disease: Prevalence and

clinical outcomes. In Otto CM (ed): Valvular Heart

Disease, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2004,

pp 1–17.

330. Borger MA, Alam A, Murphy PM, et al: Chronic

ischemic mitral regurgitation: Repair, replace or

rethink? Ann Thorac Surg 81:1153–1161, 2006.

331. Carpentier A: Cardiac valve surgery—the “French

correction”. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 86:323–337,

1983.

332. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al: ACC/

AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of

patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the

American College of Cardiology/American Heart

Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

(Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines

for the Management of Patients with Valvular

Heart Disease) developed in collaboration with the

Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists

endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angio-

graphy and Interventions and the Society of Tho-

racic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:e1–e148,

2006.

333. Carabello BA: Modern management of mitral ste-

nosis. Circulation 112:432–437, 2005.

334. Otto CM, Davis KB, Reid CL, et al: Relation between

pulmonary artery pressure and mitral stenosis seve-

rity in patients undergoing balloon mitral commis-

surotomy. Am J Cardiol 71:874–878, 1993.

335. Klein AJ, Carroll JD: Left ventricular dysfunction

and mitral stenosis. Heart Fail Clin 2:443–452,

2006.

336. Enriquez-Sarano M, Tajik AJ, Schaff HV, et al: Echo-

cardiographic prediction of survival after surgical

correction of organic mitral regurgitation. Circula-

tion 90:830–837, 1994.

337. Wanishsawad C, Roongsritong C, Sitthi-Amorn C,

et al: Spontaneous echo contrast on transthoracic

echocardiography and left atrial thrombus in rheu-

matic mitral valve disease patients: A clinicopatho-

logic study. Clin Cardiol 17:547–551, 1994.

338. Lee KS, Stewart WJ, Savage RM, et al: Systolic ante-

rior motion of mitral valve after the posterior leaflet

sliding advancement procedure. Ann Thorac Surg

57:1338–1340, 1994.

339. Alfieri O, Maisano F, De Bonis M, et al: The double-

orifice technique in mitral valve repair: A simple

solution for complex problems. J Thorac Cardiovasc

Surg 122:674–681, 2001.

340. Lee KS, Stewart WJ, Lever HM, et al: Mechanism of

outflow tract obstruction causing failed mitral valve

repair: Anterior displacement of leaflet coaptation.

Circulation 88:II24–II29, 1993.

341. Maslow AD, Regan MM, Haering JM, et al: Echo-

cardiographic predictors of left ventricular outflow

tract obstruction and systolic anterior motion of the

mitral valve after mitral valve reconstruction for

myxomatous valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol

34:2096–2104, 1999.

342. Cripe L, Andelfinger G, Martin LJ, et al: Bicuspid

aortic valve is heritable. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:138–

143, 2004.

343. Huntington K, Hunter AG, Chan KL: A prospective

study to assess the frequency of familial clustering

of congenital bicuspid aortic valve. J Am Coll

Cardiol 30:1809–1812, 1997.

344. Freeman RV, Otto CM: Spectrum of calcific aortic

valve disease: Pathogenesis, disease progression,

and treatment strategies. Circulation 111:3316–

3326, 2005.

345. Sukernik MR, Martin DE: Anesthetic management

for the surgical treatment of valvular heart diseases.

In

Hensley FA, Martin DE, Gravlee GP (eds): A

Practical Approach to Cardiac Anesthesia, 4th ed.

Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008,

pp 316–347.

346. Singh JP, Evans JC, Levy D, et al: Prevalence and

clinical determinants of mitral, tricuspid, and aortic

regurgitation (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J

Cardiol 83:897–902, 1999.

347. Bekeredjian R, Grayburn PA: Valvular heart disease:

Aortic regurgitation. Circulation 112:125–134,

2005.

Anestesia para los procedimientos de cirugía cardíaca

1737

50

Sección IV

Anestesia por subespecialidades en el adulto

© ELSEVIER. Fotocopiar sin autorización es un delito