338. Shibutani K, Inchiosa MA Jr, Sawada K, Bairamian
M: Pharmacokinetic mass of fentanyl for postope-
rative analgesia in lean and obese patients. Br J
Anaesth 95:377–383, 2005.
339. Glass PS, Doherty M, Jacobs JR, et al: Plasma con-
centration of fentanyl, with 70% nitrous oxide, to
prevent movement at skin incision. Anesthesiology
78:842–847, 1993.
340. Han T, Kim D, Kil H, Inagaki Y: The effects of
plasma fentanyl concentrations on propofol requi-
rement, emergence from anesthesia, and postopera-
tive analgesia in propofol–nitrous oxide anesthesia.
Anesth Analg 90:1365–1371, 2000.
341. Vuyk J, Lim T, Engbers FH, et al: Pharmacodyna-
mics of alfentanil as a supplement to propofol or
nitrous oxide for lower abdominal surgery in female
patients. Anesthesiology 78:1036–1045, discussion
1023A, 1993.
342. Mertens MJ, Vuyk J, Olofsen E, et al: Propofol alters
the pharmacokinetics of alfentanil in healthy male
volunteers. Anesthesiology 94:949–957, 2001.
343. Glass PS, Doherty M, Jacobs JR, et al: CP
50
for sufen-
tanil. Anesthesiology 73:A378, 1990.
344. Thomson IR, Henderson BT, Singh K, Hudson RJ:
Concentration-response relationships for fentanyl
and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary
artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology 89:852–861,
1998.
345. Patel SS, Spencer CM: Remifentanil. Drugs 52:
417–427, 1996.
346. Hogue CW Jr, Bowdle TA, O’Leary C, et al: A mul-
ticenter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia
with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient
surgery. Anesth Analg 83:279–285, 1996.
347. Avramov MN, Smith I, White PF: Interactions
between midazolam and remifentanil during moni-
tored anesthesia care.Anesthesiology 85:1283–1289,
1996.
348. Sneyd JR, Whaley A, Dimpel HL, Andrews CJ: An
open, randomized comparison of alfentanil, remi-
fentanil and alfentanil followed by remifentanil in
anaesthesia for craniotomy.Br JAnaesth 81:361–364,
1998.
349. Fletcher D, Pinaud M, Scherpereel P, et al: The effi-
cacy of intravenous 0.15 versus 0.25mg/kg intraope-
rative morphine for immediate postoperative
analgesia after remifentanil-based anesthesia for
major surgery. Anesth Analg 90:666–671, 2000.
350. Kochs E, Cote D, Deruyck L, et al: Postoperative
pain management and recovery after remifentanil-
based anaesthesia with isoflurane or propofol for
major abdominal surgery. Remifentanil Study
Group. Br J Anaesth 84:169–173, 2000.
351. Guignard B, Coste C, Costes H, et al: Supplemen-
ting desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia with small-
dose ketamine reduces perioperative opioid
analgesic requirements. Anesth Analg 95:103–108,
2002.
352. Eltzschig HK, Schroeder TH, Eissler BJ, et al: The
effect of remifentanil or fentanyl on postoperative
vomiting and pain in children undergoing stra-
bismus surgery. Anesth Analg 94:1173–1177,
2002.
353. Calderon E, Pernia A, De Antonio P, et al: A compa-
rison of two constant-dose continuous infusions of
remifentanil for severe postoperative pain. Anesth
Analg 92:715–719, 2001.
354. Vinik HR, Bradley EL Jr, Kissin I: Triple anesthetic
co
mbination:Propofol-midazolam-alfentanil.AnesthAnalg 78:354–358, 1994.
355. Vuyk J, Lim T, Engbers FH, et al: The pharmacody-
namic interaction of propofol and alfentanil during
lower abdominal surgery in women.Anesthesiology
83:8–22, 1995.
356. Stanski DR, Shafer SL: Quantifying anesthetic drug
interaction. Implications for drug dosing. Anesthe-
siology 83:1–5, 1995.
357. Richards MJ, Skues MA, Jarvis AP, Prys Roberts C:
Total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil:
Dose requirements for propofol and the effect of pre-
medication with clonidine. Br J Anaesth 65:157–163,
1990.
358. Wuesten R, Van Aken H, Glass PS, Buerkle H:
Assessment of depth of anesthesia and postopera-
tive respiratory recovery after remifentanil- versus
alfentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia in
patients undergoing ear-nose-throat surgery. Anes-
thesiology 94:211–217, 2001.
359. Vuyk J, Hennis PJ, Burm AG, et al: Comparison of
midazolam and propofol in combination with alfen-
tanil for total intravenous anesthesia. Anesth Analg
71:645–650, 1990.
360. Bell J, Sartain J, Wilkinson GA, Sherry KM: Propo-
fol and fentanyl anaesthesia for patients with low
cardiac output state undergoing cardiac surgery:
Comparison with high-dose fentanyl anaesthesia.
Br J Anaesth 73:162–166, 1994.
361. Engoren M, Luther G, Fenn Buderer N: A compa-
rison of fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil for
fast-track cardiac anesthesia. Anesth Analg 93:859–
864, 2001.
362. Howie MB, Black HA, Romanelli VA, et al: A com-
parison of isoflurane versus fentanyl as primary
anesthetics for mitral valve surgery. Anesth Analg
83:941–948, 1996.
363. Duncan HP, Cloote A, Weir PM, et al: Reducing
stress responses in the pre-bypass phase of open
heart surgery in infants and young children: A com-
parison of different fentanyl doses. Br J Anaesth
84:556–564, 2000.
364. Beilin B, Shavit Y, Hart J, et al: Effects of anesthesia
based on large versus small doses of fentanyl on
natural killer cell cytotoxicity in the perioperative
period. Anesth Analg 82:492–497, 1996.
365. Takahashi M, Sugiyama K, Hori M, et al: Naloxone
reversal of opioid anesthesia revisited: Clinical eva-
luation and plasma concentration analysis of conti-
nuous naloxone infusion after anesthesia with
high-dose fentanyl. J Anesth 18:1–8, 2004.
366. Silbert BS, Scott DA, Evered LA, et al: A comparison
of the effect of high- and low-dose fentanyl on the
incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction
after coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly.
Anesthesiology 104:1137–1145, 2006.
367. Mantz J, Abi Jaoude F, Ceddaha A, et al: High-dose
alfentanil for myocardial revascularization: A
hemodynamic and pharmacokinetic study. J Car-
diothorac Vasc Anesth 5:107–110, 1991.
368. Roekaerts PM, Gerrits HJ, Timmerman BE, de
Lange S: Continuous infusions of alfentanil and
propofol for coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac
Vasc Anesth 9:362–367, 1995.
369. Howie MB, Smith DF, Reilley TE, et al: Postopera-
tive course after sufentanil or fentanyl anesthesia for
coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
5:485–489, 1991.
370. Sareen J, Hudson RJ, Rosenbloom M, Thomson IR:
Dose-response to anaesthetic induction with sufen-
tanil: Haemodynamic and electroencephalographic
effects. Can J Anaesth 44:19–25, 1997.
371. Abrams JT, Horrow JC, Bennett JA, et al: Upper
airway closure: A primary source of difficult venti-
lation with sufentanil induction of anesthesia.
Anesth Analg 83:629–632, 1996.
372. Jain U, Body SC, Bellows W, et al: Multicenter study
of target-controlled infusion of propofol-sufentanil
or sufentanil-midazolam for coronary artery bypass
graft surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative
Ischemia (McSPI) Research Group. Anesthesiology
85:522–535, 1996.
373. Ahonen J, Olkkola KT, Verkkala K, et al: A compa-
rison of remifentanil and alfentanil for use with
propofol in patients undergoing minimally invasive
coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg
90:1269–1274, 2000.
374. Kazmaier S, Hanekop GG, Buhre W, et al: Myocar-
dial consequences of remifentanil in patients with
coronary artery disease. Br J Anaesth 84:578–583,
2000.
375. Geisler FE, de Lange S, Royston D, et al: Efficacy and
safety of remifentanil in coronary artery bypass
graft surgery: A randomized, double-blind dose
comparison study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
17:60–68, 2003.
376. Sandler AN, Baxter AD, Katz J, et al: A double-
blind, placebo-controlled trial of transdermal fen-
tanyl after abdominal hysterectomy. Analgesic,
respiratory, and pharmacokinetic effects. Anesthe-
siology 81:1169–1180, 1994.
377. Thompson JP, Bower S, Liddle AM, Rowbotham DJ:
Perioperative pharmacokinetics of transdermal fen-
tanyl in elderly and young adult patients. Br J
Anaesth 81:152–154, 1998.
378. Portenoy RK, Southam MA, Gupta SK, et al: Trans-
dermal fentanyl for cancer pain. Repeated dose
pharmacokinetics.
Anesthesiology
78:36–43,
1993.
379. Grond S, Radbruch L, Lehmann KA: Clinical phar-
macokinetics of transdermal opioids: Focus on
transdermal fentanyl. Clin Pharmacokinet 38:59–
89, 2000.
380. Ashburn MA, Streisand J, Zhang J, et al: The ionto-
phoresis of fentanyl citrate in humans. Anesthesio-
logy 82:1146–1153, 1995.
381. Power I: Fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal
system (ITS): Clinical application of iontophoretic
technology in the management of acute postopera-
tive pain. Br J Anaesth 98:4–11, 2007.
382. Viscusi ER, Reynolds L, Chung F, et al: Patient-con-
trolled transdermal fentanyl hydrochloride vs intra-
venous morphine pump for postoperative pain: A
randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291:1333–1341,
2004.
383. Moa G, Zetterstrom H: Sublingual buprenorphine
as postoperative analgesic: A double-blind compa-
rison with pethidine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
34:68–71, 1990.
384. Manara AR, Bodenham AR, Park GR: Analgesic
efficacy of perioperative buccal morphine. Br J
Anaesth 64:551–555, 1990.
385. Friesen RH, Lockhart CH: Oral transmucosal fen-
tanyl citrate for preanesthetic medication of pedia-
tric day surgery patients with andwithout droperidol
as a prophylactic anti-emetic.Anesthesiology 76:46–
51, 1992.
386. Goldstein Dresner MC, Davis PJ, Kretchman E, et
al: Double-blind comparison of oral transmucosal
fentanyl citrate with oral meperidine, diazepam,
and atropine as preanesthetic medication in chil-
dren with congenital heart disease. Anesthesiology
74:28–33, 1991.
387. Streisand JB, Varvel JR, Stanski DR, et al: Absorp-
tion and bioavailability of oral transmucosal fen-
tanyl citrate. Anesthesiology 75:223–229, 1991.
388. Egan TD, Sharma A, Ashburn MA, et al: Multiple
dose pharmacokinetics of oral transmucosal fen-
tanyl citrate in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology
92:665–673, 2000.
389. Dsida RM, Wheeler M, Birmingham PK, et al: Pre-
medication of pediatric tonsillectomy patients with
oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate. Anesth Analg
86:66–70, 1998.
Opioides
587
17
Sección
II
Farmacología y anestesia
© ELSEVIER. Fotocopiar sin autorización es un delito