Miller Anestesia

1469 / 2894

Bibliografía
1. Gray AT: Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia:
current state of the art. Anesthesiology 104:368-373,
2006.
2. Goldstein A: The effect of acoustic velocity on
phantom measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol
26:1133-1143, 2000.
3. Hefner LV, Parks JA, Goldstein A: Transducer beam
pattern test object. J Clin Ultrasound 8:5-10, 1980.
4. Goldstein A: Slice thickness measurements. J Ultra-
sound Med 7:487-498, 1988.
5. Lin DC, Nazarian LN, o’Kane PL, et al: Advantages of
real-time spatial compound sonography of the mus-
culoskeletal system versus conventional sonography.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1629-1631, 2002.
6. Hernandez A, Basset O, Chirossel P, Gimenez G:
Spatial compounding in ultrasonic imaging using an
articulated scan arm. Ultrasound Med Biol 22:229-
238, 1996.
7. Cohnen M, Saleh A, Luthen R, et al: Improvement of
sonographic needle visibility in cirrhotic livers during
transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt
procedures with use of real-time compound imaging.
J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:103-106, 2003.
8. Cheung S, Rohling R: Enhancement of needle visibi-
lity in ultrasound-guided percutaneous procedures.
Ultrasound Med Biol 30:617-624, 2004.
9. Goldstein A, Ranney D, McLeary RD: Linear array
test tool. J Ultrasound Med 8:385-397, 1989.
10. Rubin JM, Bude RO, Carson PL, et al: Power Doppler
US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequen-
cy-based color Doppler US. Radiology 190:853–856,
1994.
11. Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Derchi LE: Tendon and nerve
sonography. Radiol Clin North Am 37:691-711,
1999.
12. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine: Tech-
nical bulletin: Transducer manipulation. J Ultrasound
Med 18:169-175, 1999.
13. Grechenig W, Clement HG, Peicha G, et al: [Ultra-
sound anatomy of the sciatic nerve of the thigh].
Biomed Tech (Berl) 45:298-303, 2000, German.
14. Soong J, Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, Gray AT: The impor-
tance of transducer angle to ultrasound visibility of
the femoral nerve. Reg Anesth Pain Med 30:505,
2005.
15. Silvestri E, Martinoli C, Derchi LE, et al: Echotexture
of peripheral nerves: Correlation between US and
histologic findings and criteria to differentiate
tendons. Radiology 197:291-296, 1995.
16. Yug DP, Haughton VM, Sether LA, et al: Proximal
cervical spinal nerve: MR appearance. Radiology
184:405-408, 1992.
17. Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Santacroce E, et al: Brachial
plexus sonography: a technique for assessing the root
level. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:699-702, 2002.
18. Cartwright MS, Shin HW, Passmore LV, Walker FO:
Ultrasonographic findings of the normal ulnar nerve
in adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88:394-396, 2007.
19. Martinoli C, Schenone A, Bianchi S, et al: Sonography
of the median nerve in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1553-1556, 2002.
20. Lee D, Dauphinee DM: Morphological and functional
changes in the diabetic peripheral nerve: using diag-
nostic ultrasound and neurosensory testing to select
candidates for nerve decompression. J Am Podiatr
Med Assoc 95:433-437, 2005.
21. Bondestam S, Kreula J: Needle tip echogenicity: A
study with real time ultrasound. Invest Radiol 24:555-
560, 1989.
22. Hopkins RE, Bradley M: In-vitro visualization of
biopsy needles with ultrasound: A comparative study
of standard and echogenic needles using an ultra-
sound phantom. Clin Radiol 56:499-502, 2001.
23. Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, McCulloch CE, Gray AT:
Ultrasound visibility of needles used for regional
nerve block: An in vitro study. Reg Anesth Pain Med
29:480-488, 2004.
24. Goldstein A, Madrazo BL: Slice-thickness artifacts in
gray-scale ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 9:365-375,
1981.
25. Fornage BD: Sonographically guided core-needle
biopsy of breast masses: the «bayonet artifact.». AJR
Am J Roentgenol 164:1022-1023, 1995.
26. Gray AT, Schafhalter-Zoppoth I: «Bayonet artifact»
during ultrasound-guided transarterial axillary block.
Anesthesiology 102:1291-1292, 2005.
27. Ziskin MC, Thickman DI, Goldenberg NJ, et al: The
comet tail artifact. J Ultrasound Med 1:1-7, 1982.
28. Reading CC, Charboneau JW, Allison JW, Cooper-
berg PL: Color and spectral Doppler mirror-image
artifact of the subclavian artery. Radiology 174:41-42,
1990.
29. Filly RA, Sommer FG, Minton MJ: Characterization
of biological fluids by ultrasound and computed
tomography. Radiology 134:167-171, 1980.
30. Marhofer P, Chan VW: Ultrasound-guided regional
anesthesia: current concepts and future trends.Anesth
Analg 104:1265-1269, 2007.
31. La Grange P, Foster PA, Pretorius LK: Application of
the Doppler ultrasound bloodflow detector in supra-
clavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth 50:965-
967, 1978.
32. Kapral S, Krafft P, eibenberger K, et al: Ultrasound-
guided supraclavicular approach for regional anesthe-
sia of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg 78:507-513,
1994.
33. Yang WT, Chui PT, Metreweli C: Anatomy of the
normal brachial plexus revealed by sonography and
the role of sonographic guidance in anesthesia of the
brachial plexus.AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1631-1636,
1998.
34. Williams SR, Chouinard P, Arcand G, et al: Ultra-
sound guidance speeds execution and improves the
quality of supraclavicular block. Anesth Analg
97:1518-1523, 2003.
35. Collins AB, Gray AT, Kessler J: Ultrasound-guided
supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a modified
plumb-bob technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med 31:591-
592, 2006.
36. Kessler J,Gray AT: Sonography of scalene muscle ano-
malies for brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain
Med 32:172-173, 2007.
37. Tubbs RS, Tyler-Kabara EC, Salter EG, et al: Additio-
nal vascular compression of the brachial plexus in a
cadaver with a cervical rib: case illustration. Surg
Radiol Anat 28:112-113, 2006.
38. Bigeleisen P, Wilson M: A comparison of two techni-
ques for ultrasound guided infraclavicular block. Br J
Anaesth 96:502-507, 2006.
39. Porter JM, McCartney CJ, Chan VW: Needle place-
ment and injection posterior to the axillary artery
may predict successful infraclavicular brachial plexus
block:A report of three cases.Can J Anaesth 52:69-73,
2005.
40. Dingemans E, Williams SR, Arcand G, et al: Neurosti-
mulation in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block:A
prospective randomized trial. Anesth Analg 104:1275-
1280, 2007.
41. Sandhu NS, Manne JS, Medabalmi PK, Capan LM:
Sonographically guided infraclavicular brachial
plexus block in adults: A retrospective analysis of
1146 cases. J Ultrasound Med 25:1555-1561, 2006.
42. Schroeder LE, Horlocker TT, Schroeder DR: The effi-
cacy of axillary block for surgical procedures about
the elbow. Anesth Analg 83:747-751, 1996.
43. Retzl G, Kapral S, Greher M, Mauritz W: Ultrasono-
graphic findings of the axillary part of the brachial
plexus. Anesth Analg 92:1271-1275, 2001.
44. Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, Gray AT: The musculocuta-
neous nerve: ultrasound appearance for peripheral
nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 30:385-390, 2005.
45. Thompson GE, Rorie DK: Functional anatomy of the
brachial plexus sheaths. Anesthesiology 59:117-122,
1983.
46. Klaastad O, Smedby O, Thompson GE, et al: Distribu-
tion of local anesthetic in axillary brachial plexus
block: A clinical and magnetic resonance imaging
study. Anesthesiology 96:1315-1324, 2002.
47. Sites BD, Beach ML, Spence BC, et al: Ultrasound
guidance improves the success rate of a perivascular
axillary plexus block.ActaAnaesthesiol Scand 50:678-
684, 2006.
48. Chan VW, Perlas A, McCartney CJ, et al: Ultrasound
guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial
plexus block. Can J Anaesth 54:176-182, 2007.
49. Bigeleisen PE: The bifid axillary artery. J Clin Anesth
16:224-225, 2004.
50. Orebaugh SL, Pennington S: Variant location of the
musculocutaneous nerve during axillary nerve block.
J Clin Anesth 18:541-544, 2006.
51. Flatow EL, Bigliani LU, April EW: An anatomic study
of the musculocutaneous nerve and its relationship to
the coracoid process. Clin Orthop Relat Res 244:166-
171, 1989.
52. el-Naggar MM: A study on the morphology of the
coracobrachialis muscle and its relationship with the
musculocutaneous nerve. Folia Morphol (Warsz)
60:217-224, 2001.
53. Eglseder WA Jr, Goldman M: Anatomic variations of
the musculocutaneous nerve in the arm.Am J Orthop
26:777-780, 1997.
54. Andrew Gray’seg Ultrasound Imaging Laboratory at
UCSF. Available at
55. Eichenberger U, Greher M, Kirchmair L, et al: Ultra-
sound-guided blocks of the ilioinguinal and iliohypo-
gastric nerve: Accuracy of a selective new technique
confirmed by anatomical dissection. Br J Anaesth
97:238-243, 2006.
56. Rankin G, Stokes M, Newham DJ: Abdominal muscle
size and symmetry in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve
34:320-326, 2006.
57. Willschke H, Marhofer P, Bosenberg A, et al: Ultraso-
nography for ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve
blocks in children. Br J Anaesth 95:226-230, 2005.
58. McDonnell JG, o’Donnell B, Curley G, et al: The anal-
gesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block
after abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized
controlled trial. Anesth Analg 104:193-197, 2007.
59. Heart Web: News for Heart Professionals.Available at
60. Rosario DJ, Jacob S, Luntley J, et al: Mechanism of
femoral nerve palsy complicating percutaneous ilio-
inguinal field block. Br J Anaesth 78:314-316, 1997.
61. Marhofer P, Schrogendorfer K, Koinig H, et al: Ultra-
sonographic guidance improves sensory block and
onset time of three-in-one blocks. Anesth Analg
85:854-857, 1997.
62. Marhofer P, Schrogendorfer K,Wallner T, et al: Ultra-
sonographic guidance reduces the amount of local
anesthetic for 3-in-1 blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med
23:584-588, 1998.
63. Gruber H, Peer S, Kovacs P, et al: The ultrasonogra-
phic appearance of the femoral nerve and cases of
iatrogenic impairment. J Ultrasound Med 22:163-172,
2003.
64. Sites BD, Spence BC, Gallagher JD, et al: Characteri-
zing novice behavior associated with learning ultra-
sound-guided peripheral regional anesthesia. Reg
Anesth Pain Med 32:107-115, 2007.
65. Dalens B, Vanneuville G, Tanguy A: Comparison of
the fascia iliaca compartment block with the 3-in-1
block in children. Anesth Analg 69:705-713, 1989.
66. Gray AT, Collins AB, Schafhalter-Zoppoth I: Sciatic
nerve block in a child: A sonographic approach.
Anesth Analg 97:1300-1302, 2003.
67. Sinha A, Chan VW: Ultrasound imaging for popliteal
sciatic nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 29:130-134,
2004.
68. Tsui BC, Finucane BT: The importance of ultrasound
landmarks: a «traceback» approach using the popli-
teal blood vessels for identification of the sciatic
nerve. Reg Anesth Pain Med 31:481-482, 2006.
69. Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, younger SJ, Collins AB, Gray
AT: The «seesaw» sign: improved sonographic identi-
fication of the sciatic nerve. Anesthesiology 101:808-
809, 2004.
70. Gray AT, Huczko EL, Schafhalter-Zoppoth I: Lateral
popliteal nerve block with ultrasound guidance. Reg
Anesth Pain Med 29:507-509, 2004.
Guía ecográfica en la anestesia regional 1469 43
Sección III
Control de la anestesia
© ELSEVIER. Fotocopiar sin autorización es un delito