Miller Anestesia

65. Friedman EA: Labor: Clinical Evaluation and

Management.EastNorwalk,CT,Appleton-Century-

Crofts, 1967.

66. Zhang J, Klebanoff MA, DerSimonian R: Epidural

analgesia in association with duration of labor and

mode of delivery: A quantitative review. Am J

Obstet Gynecol 180:970–977, 1999.

67. Zhang J, Yancey MK, Klebanoff MA, et al: Does epi-

dural analgesia prolong labor and increase risk of

cesarean delivery? A natural experiment. Am J

Obstet Gynecol 185:128–134, 2001.

68. Segal S, Su M, Gilbert P: The effect of a rapid change

in availability of epidural analgesia on the cesarean

delivery rate: A meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol

183:974–978, 2000.

69. Stolte K: A comparison of women’s expectations of

labor with the actual event. Birth 14:99–103, 1987.

70. Melzack R: The myth of painless childbirth. The

John J. Bonica lecture. Pain 19:321–327, 1984.

71. Eltzchig HK, Lieberman ES, Camann WR: Regional

anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery. N

Engl J Med 348:319, 2003.

72. Read GD: Natural Childbirth. London, Heinemann,

1933.

73. Kennell J, Klaus M, McGrath S, et al: Continuous

emotional support during labor in a US hospital.

JAMA 265:2197–2201, 1991.

74. Han JS, Chen XH, Sun SL, et al: Effect of low- and

highfrequency transcutaneous electrical nerve sti-

mulation on Met-enkephalin-Arg-Phe and dynor-

phin A immunoreactivity in human lumbar CSF.

Pain 47:295–298, 1991.

75. Kaplan B, Rabinerson D, Lurie S, et al: Transcuta-

neous electrical nerve stimulation for adjunct pain

relief during labor and delivery. Int J Gynaecol

Obstet 60:251–255, 1998.

76. Tsen L, Thomas J, Segal S, et al: Transcutaneous

electrical nerve stimulation does not augment epi-

dural labor analgesia. J Clin Anesth 13:571–575,

2001.

77. Hawkins JL, Beaty BR: Update on obstetric anesthe-

sia practices in the United States [abstract]. Anes-

thesiology 91:A1060, 1999.

78. Kuhnert BR, Kuhnert BM, Tu ASI, et al: Meperidine

and normeperidine levels following meperidine

administration during labor: Fetus and neonate. Am

J Obstet Gynecol 133:909–914, 1979.

79. Way WL, Costley EC, Way EL: Respiratory sensiti-

vity of the newborn infant to meperidine and mor-

phine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 6:454–461, 1965.

80. Bricker L, Lavender T: Parenteral opioids for labor

pain relief: A systematic review. Am J Obstet

Gynecol 186(5 Suppl Nature):S94–S109, 2002.

81. Kan RE, Hughes SC, Rosen MA, et al: Intravenous

remifentanil: Placental transfer, maternal and

neonatal effects. Anesthesiology 88:1167–1174,

1998.

82. Roelants F, De Franceschi E, Veyckemans F, et al:

Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using

remifentanil in the parturient. Can J Anaesth

48:175–178, 2001.

83. Nikkola EM, Ekblad UU, Kero PO, et al: Intravenous

fentanyl PCA during labour. Can J Anaesth

44:1248–1255, 1997.

84. Craft JB, Coaldrake LA, Bolan JC, et al: Placental

passage and uterine effects of fentanyl. Anesth Analg

62:894, 1983.

85. Morley-Forster PK, Reid DW, Vandeberghe H: A

comparison of patient controlled analgesia: Fen-

tanyl and alfentanil for labour analgesia. Can J

Anaesth 47:113–119, 2000.

86. Eisele JH, Wright R, Rogge P: Newborn and mater-

nal fentanyl levels at cesarean section. Anesth Analg

61:179, 1982.

87. Rayburn W, Rathke A, Leuschen P, et al: Fentanyl

citrate analgesia during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol

161:202, 1989.

88. Rayburn WF, Smith CV, Parriott JE, et al: Randomi-

zed comparison of meperidine and fentanyl during

labor. Obstet Gynecol 4:604–606, 1989.

89. Gal TJ: Analgesia and respiratory depressant activity

of nalbuphine: A comparison with morphine. Anes-

thesiology 55:367, 1982.

90. Hatjis CG, Meis PJ: Sinusoidal fetal heart rate

pattern associated with butanorphal administration.

Anesthesiology 67:377, 1986.

91. Feinstein SJ, Lodeiro JG, Vintzileos M: Sinusoidal

fetal heart rate pattern after administration of nal-

buphine hydrochloride: A case report. Am J Obstet

Gynecol 154:159, 1986.

92. Weintraub SJ, Naulty JS: Acute abstinence syndrome

after epidural injection of butorphanol. Anesth

Analg 64:452–453, 1985.

93. Glass PSA, Hardman D, Kamiyama Y, et al: Prelimi-

nary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of

an ultra-short acting opioid: Remifentanil. Anesth

Analg 77:1031–1040, 1993.

94. Evron S, Glezerman M, Sadan O, et al: Remifentanil:

A novel systemic analgesic for labor pain. Anesth

Analg 100:233–238, 2005.

95. Volmanen P, Akural EI, Raudaskoski T, et al: Remi-

fentanil in obstetric analgesia: A dose-finding study.

Anesth Analg 94:913–917, 2002.

96. Owen MD, Poss MJ, Dean LS, et al: Prolonged intra-

venous remifentanil infusion for labor analgesia.

Anesth Analg 194:918–919, 2002.

97. Saunders TA, Glass PSA: A trial of labor for remi-

fentanil. Anesth Analg 94:771–773, 2002.

98. Irving FC: Advantages and disadvantages of barbi-

turates in obstetrics. R I Med J 28:493, 1945.

99. McQuitty FM: Relief of pain in labour: A controlled

double-blind trial comparing pethedine and various

phenothiazine derivatives. J Obstet Gynaecol Br

Commonw 74:925–928, 1967.

100. Eisenstein JI, Rubin EJ, Arnold M, et al: Propioma-

zine hydrochloride in obstetrics. Am J Obstet

Gynecol 88:606–611, 1964.

101. Mercier F, Benhamou D: Promising non-narcotic

analgesic techniques for labour. Baillieres Clin

Obstet Gynaecol 12:397–407, 1998.

102. Akamatu TJ, Bonica JJ, Rehmet R, et al: Experiences

with the use of ketamine for parturition. Part I.

Primary anesthesia for vaginal delivery. Anesth

Analg 53:284–287, 1974.

103. McElhatton PR: The effects of benzodiazepine use

during pregnancy and lactation. Reprod Toxicol

8:461–475, 1994.

104. Shiono PH, Mills JL: Oral clefts and diazepam use

during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 311:919–920,

1984.

105. Seideman SF, Marx GF: Midazolam in obstetric

anesthesia. Anesthesiology 67:443–444, 1987.

106. Kronberg JE, Thompson DEA: Is nitrous oxide an

effective analgesic for labor? A qualitative systematic

review.

Halpern SH, Douglas MJ (eds): Evidence-

Based Obstetric Anesthesia. London, Blackwell,

2005.

107. Toscano A, Pancaro S, Giovannoni G: Sevoflurane

analgesia in obstetrics: A pilot study. Int J Obstet

Anesth 12:79–82, 2003.

108. Yeo ST, Holdcroft A, Yentis SM, et al: Analgesia with

sevoflurane during labour. Part I. Determination of

the optimum concentration. Br J Anaesth 98:105–

109, 2007.

109. Yeo ST, Holdcroft A, Yentis SM, et al: Analgesia with

sevoflurane during labour. Part II. Sevoflurane com-

pared with Entonox for labour analgesia. Br J

Anaesth 98:110–115, 2007.

110. Suelto MD, Shaw DB: Labor analgesia with paraver-

tebral lumbar sympathetic block. Reg Anesth Pain

Med 24:179–181, 1999.

111. Eisenberg DM, Davies RB, Ettner SL, et al: Trends

in alternative medicine use in the USA 1990-97:

Results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA

280:1569–1575, 1998.

112. Hepner DL, Harnett M, Segal S, et al: Herbal medi-

cine use in parturients. Anesth Analg 94:690–693,

2002.

113. Pattee C, Ballantyne M, Milne B: Epidural analgesia

for labour and delivery: Informed consent issues.

Can J Anaesth 44:918–923, 1997.

114. Arzola C, Davies S, Rofaeel A, Carvalho JC: Ultra-

sound using the transverse approach to the

lumbar spine provides reliable landmarks for

labor epidurals. Anesth Analg 104:1188–1192,

2007.

115. Norris MC, Ferrenbach D, Dalman H, et al: Does

epinephrine improve the diagnostic accuracy of

aspiration during labor epidural analgesia? Anesth

Analg 88:1073, 1999.

116. Birnbach DJ, Chestnut DH: The epidural test dose

in obstetric practice: Has it outlived its usefulness?

Anesth Analg 88:971, 1999.

117. Moore DC, Batra MS: The components of an effec-

tive test dose prior to epidural block. Anesthesiology

55:693, 1981.

118. Hood DD, Dewan DM, James FM III: Maternal and

fetal effect of epinephrine in gravid ewes. Anesthe-

siology 64:610, 1986.

119. Leighton BL, Norris MC, DeSimone CA, et al: The

air test as a clinically useful indicator of intrave-

nously placed epidural catheters. Anesthesiology

73:610, 1990.

120. Russell I: In the event of accidental dural puncture

by an epidural needle in labour, the catheter should

be passed into the subarachnoid space. Int J Obstet

Anesth 11:23–27, 2002.

121. Rigler ML, Drasner K: Distribution of catheter-

injected local anesthetic in a model of the subara-

chnoid space. Anesthesiology 75:684–692, 1991.

122. Ross BK, Coda B, Heath CH: Local anesthetic dis-

tribution in a spinal model: A possible mechanism

of neurologic injury after continuous spinal anes-

thesia. Reg Anesth 17:69–77, 1992.

123. Arkoosh VA, Palmer CM, Yun EM, et al: A rando-

mized, double-masked, multicenter comparison of

the safety of continuous intrathecal labor analgesia

using a 28-gauge catheter versus continuous epidu-

ral labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 108:286–298,

2008.

124. Viscomi CM, Rathmell JP, Pace NL: Duration of

intrathecal labor analgesia: Early versus advanced

labor. Anesth Analg 84:1108–1112, 1997.

125. Collis RE, Davies DW, Aveling W: Randomised

comparison of combined spinal epidural and stan-

dard epidural analgesia in labour. Lancet 345:1413–

1416, 1995.

126. Palmer CM, Randall CC, Hays R, et al: The dose-

response relation of intrathecal fentanyl for labor

analgesia. Anesthesiology 88:355–361, 1998.

127. Campbell DC, CamannWR, Datta S, et al: The addi-

tion of bupivacaine to intrathecal sufentanil for

labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 81:305–309, 1995.

128. Sia AT, Chong JL, Chiu JW: Combination of intra-

thecal sufentanil 10 mcg plus bupivacaine 2.5 mg for

labor analgesia: Is half the dose enough? Anesth

Analg 88:362–366, 1999.

129. Hughes D, Hill D, Fee JP: Intrathecal ropivacaine or

bupivacaine with fentanyl for labour. Br J Anaesth

87:733–737, 2001.

130. Vercauteren MP, Haus G, De Decker K, et al:

Levobupivacaine combined with sufentanil for

intrathecal labor analgesia: A comparison with

racemic bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 93:996–1000,

2001.

131. Tsen L, Thue B, Datta S, et al: Is combined spinal-

epidural analgesia associated with more rapid cer-

vical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared

with conventional epidural analgesia? Anesthesio-

logy 91:920–925, 1999.

132. Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, et al: The

risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia

given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med

352:655–665, 2005.

133. Clarke VT, Smiley RM, Finster M: Uterine hyperac-

tivity after intrathecal injection of fentanyl for anal-

gesia during labor: A cause of fetal bradycardia?

Anesthesiology 81:1083, 1994.

134. D’Angelo R, Eisenach JC: Severe maternal hypoten-

sion and fetal bradycardia after a CSE. Anesthesio-

logy 81:116–118, 1997.

135. O’Gorman Birnbach DJ, Kuczkowski KM, et al: Use

of umbilical flow velocimetry in the assessment of

the pathogenesis of fetal bradycardia following

combined spinal epidural analgesia in parturients

[abstract]. Anesthesiology 92:A2, 2000.

136. Priddle HD, Andros GJ: Primary spinal anesthetic

effects of epinephrine. Anesth Analg 29:156–162,

1950.

Anestesia en obstetricia

2003

Sección IV

Anestesia por subespecialidades en el adulto