Miller Anestesia

Anestesia para la cirugía robótica

2169

Sección IV

Anestesia por subespecialidades en el adulto

43. Reichenspurner H, Boehm DH, Gulbins H, et al:

Three-dimensional video and robot-assisted port-

access mitral valve operation. Ann Thorac Surg

69:1176–1181, 2000.

44. Boyd WD, Rayman R, Desai ND, et al: Closed-chest

coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart

with the use of a computer-enhanced surgical robotic

system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120:807–809,

2000.

45. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, et al: Total endoscopic

off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Surg

Forum 3:29–31, 2000.

46. Bakir I, Gasselman FP, Brugada P, et al: Current stra-

tegies in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation:

Review of the literature and Onze Lieve Vrouw

Clinic’s strategy. Ann Thorac Surg 83:331–340, 2007.

47. Gerosa G, Bianco R, Buja G, et al: Totally endoscopic

robotic-guided pulmonary veins ablation: An alterna-

tive method for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Eur

J Cardiothorac Surg 26:450–452, 2004.

48. Loulmet DF, Patel NC, Patel NU, et al: First robotic

endoscopic epicardial isolation of the pulmonary

veins with microwave energy in a patient in chronic

atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 78:e24–e25, 2004.

49. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, et al: Cardiac

resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J

Med 346:1845–1853, 2002.

50. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, et al: Cardiac-

resynchronization therapy with or without an implan-

table defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N

Engl J Med 350:2140–2150, 2004.

51. DeRose JJ, Ashton RC, Belsley S, et al: Robotically

assisted left ventricular epicardial lead implantation

for biventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:1414–

1419, 2003.

52. Mair H, Jansens JL, Lattouf OM, et al: Epicardial lead

implantation techniques for biventricular pacing via

left lateral mini-thoracotomy, video-assisted thora-

coscopy, and robotic approach. Heart Surg Forum

6:412–417, 2003.

53. Morgan JA, Ginsburg ME, Sonett JR, et al: Advanced

thoracoscopic procedures are facilitated by computer-

aided robotic technology. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

23:883–887, 2003.

54. Augustin F, Schmid T, Bodner J: The robotic approach

for mediastinal lesions. Int J Med Robot 2:262–270,

2006.

55. Kernstine KH: Robotics in thoracic surgery. Am

J Surg 188(4A Suppl)89S–97S, 2004.

56. Bodner JC, Zitt M, Ott H, et al: Robotic-assisted thor

acoscopic surgery (RATS) for benign and malignant

esophageal tumors. AnnThorac Surg 80:1202–1206, 2005.

57. Kernstine KH, DeArmond DT, Shamoun DM, et al:

The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies

with three-field lymphadenectomy: Initial experience.

Surg Endosc 21:2285–2292, 2007.

58. Park BJ, Flores RM, Rusch VW: Robotic assistance for

video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: Techni-

que and initial results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

131:54–59, 2006.

59. Gerszten PC, Burton SA, Ozhasoglu C: CyberKnife

radiosurgery for spinal neoplasms. Prog Neurol Surg

20:340–358, 2007.

60. Varma TR, Eldridge PR, Forster A, et al: Use of the

NeuroMate stereotactic robot in a frameless mode for

movement disorder surgery. Stereotact Funct Neuro-

surg 80(1-4)132–135, 2003.

61. Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Ng WS, et al: The develop-

ment of a surgeon robot for prostatectomies. Proc Inst

Mech Eng (H) 205:35–38, 1991.

62. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, et al: Evidence from

robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:

A systematic review. Eur Urol 51:45–55, 2007.

63. Miller NL, Theodorescu D: Status of robotic cystec-

tomy in 2005. World J Urol 24:180–187, 2006.

64. Kumar R, Hemal AK, Menon M: Robotic renal and

adrenal surgery: Present and future. BJU Int 96:244–

249, 2005.

65. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical

prostatectomy: The Montsouris experience. J Urol

163:418–422, 2000.

66. Descazeaud A, Peyromaure M, Zerbib M: Will

robotic surgery become the gold standard for radical

prostatectomy? Eur Urol 51:9–11, 2007.

67. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M: A prospective

comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted

prostatectomy: Experience in one institution. BJU Int

92:205–210, 2003.

68. Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, et al: Robot-assisted

versus open radical prostatectomy: A comparison of

one surgeon’s outcomes. Urology 63:819–822,

2004.

69. Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, et al: Robot-assisted

vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Are there

any differences? BJU Int 96:39–42, 2005.

70. Tewari A, Peabody J, Sarle R, et al: Technique of da

Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy.

Urology 60:569–572, 2002.

71. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, et al: Heilbronn

laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Technique and

results after 100 cases. Eur Urol 40:54–64, 2001.

72. Keim JL, Theodorescu D. Robot-assisted radical cys-

tectomy in the management of bladder cancer. Sci

World J 6:2560–2565, 2006.

73. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, et al: Nerve-sparing

robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary

diversion. BJU Int 92:232–236, 2003.

74. Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, et al: Robotic-

assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomo-

sis: A human pilot study. Fertil Steril 73:1040–1042,

2000.

75. Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, et al: Robo-

tically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal rea-

nastomosis: A feasibility study. Fertil Steril

74:1020–1023, 2000.

76. Nezhat C, Saberi NS, Shahmohamady B, et al: Robo-

tic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery.

Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

10:317–320, 2006.

77. Field JB, Benoit MF, Dinh TA, et al: Computer-

enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Surg Endosc 21:244–246, 2007.

78. Paul HA, Bargar WL, Mittlestadt B, et al: Development

of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthro-

plasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 285:57–66, 1992.

79. Bargar WL, Bauer A, Borner M: Primary and revision

total hip replacement using the Robodoc system. Clin

Orthop 354:82–91, 1998.

80. Bargar WL: Robots in orthopaedic surgery: Past,

present, and future. Clin Orthop 463:31–36, 2007.

81. Honl M, Dierk O, Gauck C, et al: Comparison of

robotic-assisted and manual implantation of a

primary total hip replacement: A prospective study.

J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1470–1478, 2003.

82. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Gaudenzi A: Patellofemoral

functional results and complications with the poste-

rior stabilized total condylar knee prosthesis.

J Arthroplasty 3:17–25, 1988.

83. Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, et al: Hands-on robotic

unicompartmental knee replacement: A prospective,

randomised controlled study of the acrobot system.

J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:188–197, 2006.

84. Decking J, Theis C, Achenbach T, et al: Robotic total

knee arthroplasty: The accuracy of CT-based compo-

nent placement. Acta Orthop Scand 75:573–579,

2004.

85. Siemionow M, Ozer K, Siemionow W, et al: Robotic

assistance in microsurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg

16:643–649, 2000.

86. D’Attellis N, Loulmet D, Carpentier A, et al: Robotic-

assisted cardiac surgery: Anesthetic and postoperative

considerations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 16:397–

400, 2002.