Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1174 / 2894 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1174 / 2894 Next Page
Page Background

1174

Control de la anestesia

III

44. Panja M, Sarkar CN, Kumar S, et al: Reuse of pace-

maker. Indian Heart J 48:677–680, 1996.

45. Aldrete JA, Brown C, Daily J, Buerke V: Pacemaker

malfunction due to microcurrent injection from a

bioimpedance noninvasive cardiac output monitor.

J Clin Monit 11:131–133, 1995.

46. Levine PA: Response to “rate-adaptive cardiac

pacing”: Implications of environmental noise

during craniotomy. Anesthesiology 87:1261, 1997.

47. Madsen GM, Andersen C: Pacemaker-induced

tachycardia during general anaesthesia: A case

report. Br J Anaesth 63:360–361, 1989.

48. Rozner MA, Nishman RJ: Pacemaker-driven tachy-

cardia revisited. Anesth Analg 88:965, 1999.

49. Rozner MA, Nishman RJ: Electrocautery-induced

pacemaker tachycardia: Why does this error conti-

nue? Anesthesiology 96:773–774, 2002.

50. Interaction between minute ventilation rate–adap-

tive pacemakers and cardiac monitoring and diag-

nosticequipment.CenterforDevicesandRadiologic

Health. Published October 14, 1998. Available at

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/minutevent.html/

Accessed January 1, 2007.

51. Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, et al: Magnetic

resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at

1.5-Tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1315–1324, 2004.

52. Hayes JJ, Juknavorian R, Maloney JD: The role(s) of

the industry employed allied professional. Pacing

Clin Electrophysiol 24:398–399, 2001.

53. Kleinman B, Hamilton J, Hariman R, et al: Apparent

failure of a precordial magnet and pacemaker pro-

grammer to convert a DDD pacemaker to VOO

mode during the use of the electrosurgical unit.

Anesthesiology 86:247–250, 1997.

54. Preisman S,Cheng DC: Life-threatening ventricular

dysrhythmias with inadvertent asynchronous tem-

porary pacing after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology

91:880–883, 1999.

55. Andersen C, Madsen GM: Rate-responsive pace-

makers and anaesthesia.A consideration of possible

implications. Anaesthesia 45:472–476, 1990.

56. Levine PA, Balady GJ, Lazar HL, et al: Electrocau-

tery and pacemakers: Management of the paced

patient subject to electrocautery. Ann Thorac Surg

41:313–317, 1986.

57. Rozner MA, Nguyen AD: Unexpected pacing thres-

hold changes during non-implant surgery.Anesthe-

siology 96:A1070, 2002.

58. Levine PA, Gauch P: Utilizacao clinica da autocap-

tura. Reblampa 16:31–41, 2003.

59. Chew EW, Troughear RH, Kuchar DL, Thorburn

CW: Inappropriate rate change in minute ventila-

tion rate responsive pacemakers due to interference

by cardiac monitors. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

20:276–282, 1997.

60. Walldén J, Gupta A, Carlsén HO: Supraventricular

tachycardia induced by Datex patient monitoring

system. Anesth Analg 86:1339, 1998.

61. Van Hemel NM, Hamerlijnck RP, Pronk KJ,Van der

Veen EP: Upper limit ventricular stimulation in

respiratory rate responsive pacing due to electro-

cautery. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 12:1720–1723,

1989.

62. Wong DT, Middleton W: Electrocautery-induced

tachycardia in a rate-responsive pacemaker. Anes-

thesiology 94:710–711, 2001.

63. Southorn PA, Kamath GS, Vasdev GM, Hayes DL:

Monitoring equipment induced tachycardia in

patients with minute ventilation rate–responsive

pacemakers. Br J Anaesth 84:508–509, 2000.

64. Patel SI, Souter MJ: Equipment-related electrocar-

diographic artifacts: Causes, characteristics, conse-

quences, and correction. Anesthesiology 108:

138–148, 2008.

65. Rozner MA: Peripheral nerve stimulators can

inhibit monitor display of pacemaker pulses. J Clin

Anesth 16:117–120, 2004.

66. Samain E, Schauveliege F, Henry C, Marty J:

Outcome in patients with a cardiac pacemaker

undergoing noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology

95:A142, 2001.

67. Samain E, Marty J, Souron V, et al: Intraoperative

pacemaker malfunction during a shoulder arthros-

copy. Anesthesiology 93:306–307, 2000.

68. Pressly N. Review of MDR reports reinforces

concern about EMI. FDA User Facility Reporting

#20. Published 1997. Available at

http://www.fda. gov/cdrh/fuse20.pdf/

Accessed January 1, 2007.

69. Rozner MA: Review of electrical interference in

implanted cardiac devices. Pacing Clin Electrophy-

siol 26:923–925, 2003.

70. Rozner MA, Burton AW, Kumar AJ: Pacemaker

complication during MRI. J Am Coll Cardiol

45:161–162, 2005.

71. Trankina MF, Black S, Gibby G: Pacemakers: Perio-

perative evaluation, management and complica-

tions. Anesthesiology 93:A1193, 2000.

72. Gimbel JR, Johnson D, Levine PA, Wilkoff BL: Safe

performance of magnetic resonance imaging on

five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:913–919, 1996.

73. Gimbel JR, Kanal E, Schwartz KM, Wilkoff BL:

Outcome of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in

selected patients with implantable cardioverter defi-

brillators (ICDs). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

28:270–273, 2005.

74. Alexopoulos GS, Frances RJ: ECT and cardiac

patientswithpacemakers.AmJPsychiatry137:1111–

1112, 1980.

75. Engelhardt L,Grosse J,Birnbaum J,Volk T: Inhibition

of a pacemaker during nerve stimulation for regional

anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 62:1071–1074, 2007.

76. O’Flaherty D, Wardill M, Adams AP: Inadvertent

suppression of a fixed rate ventricular pacemaker

using a peripheral nerve stimulator. Anaesthesia

48:687–689, 1993.

77. Moskowitz DM, Kahn RA, Camunas J, et al: Exter-

nal chest wall stimulation to suppress a permanent

transvenous pacemaker in a patient during endo-

vascular stent graft placement. Anesthesiology

89:531–533, 1998.

78. Philbin DM, Marieb MA, Aithal KH, Schoenfeld

MH: Inappropriate shocks delivered by an ICD as a

result of sensed potentials from a transcutaneous

electronic nerve stimulation unit. Pacing Clin Elec-

trophysiol 21:2010–2011, 1998.

79. Vlay SC: Electromagnetic interference and ICD dis-

charge related to chiropractic treatment. Pacing

Clin Electrophysiol 21:2009, 1998.

80. McKay RE,Rozner MA: Preventing pacemaker pro-

blems with nerve stimulators. Anaesthesia 63:

554–556, 2008, author reply 556-557.

81. Finfer SR: Pacemaker failure on induction of anaes-

thesia. Br J Anaesth 66:509–512, 1991.

82. Altose M, Leon-Ruiz E: Etomidate-induced pace-

maker-mediated ventricular tachycardia. Anesthe-

siology 106:1059–1060, 2007.

83. Rozner MA: Etomidate unlikely to have induced

pacemaker-mediated tachycardia. Anesthesiology

107:1036, author reply 1037, 2007.

84. Bohm A, Kayser S, Pinter A, Preda I: Intermittent

output failure of a VVI device due to the disintegra-

tion of the generator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

24:127–128, 2001.

85. Grimm W, Menz V, Hoffmann J, et al: Complica-

tions of third-generation implantable cardioverter

defibrillator therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

22:206–211, 1999.

86. Rozner MA, Trankina MF: Intrathoracic gadgets:

Update on pacemakers and implantable cardiover-

ter defibrillators.ASA Refresher Course Anesthesiol

28:183–199, 2000.

87. Roth JV, Brody JD, Denham EJ: Positioning the

pacing esophageal stethoscope for transesophageal

atrial pacing without P-wave recording: Implica-

tions for transesophageal ventricular pacing.Anesth

Analg 83:48–54, 1996.

88. Mychaskiw G, Eichhorn JH: Interaction of an

implanted pacemaker with a transesophageal atrial

pacemaker: Report of a case. J Clin Anesth 11:

669–671, 1999.

89. Snow N: Acute myocardial ischemia during pace-

maker implantation: Implication for threshold

determinations and potential complications. Pacing

Clin Electrophysiol 6:35–37, 1983.

90. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al: Improved sur-

vival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with

coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arr-

hythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator

Implantation Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med

335:1933–1940, 1996.

91. A.V.I.D.Investigators:A comparison of antiarrhyth-

mic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in

patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular

arrhythmias.The Antiarrhythmics versus Implanta-

ble Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. N Engl J

Med 337:1576–1583, 1997.

92. Buxton AE, Lee KL, Fisher JD, et al: A randomized

study of the prevention of sudden death in patients

with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustai-

ned Tachycardia Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med

341:1882–1890, 1999.

93. Moss A, Zareba W, Hall W, et al: Prophylactic

implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myo-

cardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N

Engl J Med 346:877–883, 2002.

94. BernsteinAD,CammAJ,Fisher JD,et al: NorthAme-

rican Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology policy

statement. The NASPE/BPEG defibrillator code.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 16:1776–1780, 1993.

95. Grimm W, Flores BF, Marchlinski FE: Electrocar-

diographically documented unnecessary, sponta-

neous shocks in 241 patients with implantable

cardioverter defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophy-

siol 15:1667–1673, 1992.

96. Hurst TM, Krieglstein H, Tillmanns H, Waldecker

B: Inappropriate management of self-terminating

ventricular arrhythmias by implantable cardiover-

ter defibrillators despite a specific reconfirmation

algorithm: A report of two cases. Pacing Clin Elec-

trophysiol 20:1328–1331, 1997.

97. Prasad K,KishoreAG,AndersonMH,et al: Inappro-

priate shocks in patients receiving internal cardio-

verter-defibrillators for malignant ventricular

arrhythmias. Indian Heart J 49:403–407, 1997.

98. Schumacher B, Tebbenjohanns J, Jung W, et al:

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter

that elicits inappropriate implantable cardioverter

defibrillator discharge. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

20:125–127, 1997.

99. Rozner MA: The patient with an implantable car-

dioverter-defibrillator. Prog Anesthesiol 13:43–52,

1999.

100. S

werdlowCD:Supraventricular

tachycardia–ventricu-

lar tachycardia discrimination algorithms in implanta-

ble cardioverter defibrillators: State-of-the-art review.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 12:606–612, 2001.

101. Wilkoff BL,Cook JR,EpsteinAE,et al: Dual-chamber

pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with

an implantable defibrillator—The Dual Chamber and

VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA

288:3115–3123, 2002.