Miller Anestesia

85. Ackerstaff RG, van de Vlasakker CJ: Monitoring of

brain function during carotid endarterectomy: An

analysis of contemporary methods. J Cardiothorac

Vasc Anesth 12:341, 1998.

86. Kearse LA Jr, Brown EN, McPeck K: Somatosensory

evoked potentials sensitivity relative to electroen-

cephalography for cerebral ischemia during carotid

endarterectomy. Stroke 23:498, 1992.

87. Wober C, Zeitlhofer J, Asenbaum S, et al: Monito-

ring of median nerve somatosensory evoked poten-

tials in carotid surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:429,

1998.

88. Halsey JH, McDowell HA, Gelman S: Transcranial

Doppler and rCBF compared in carotid endarterec-

tomy. Stroke 17:1206-1208, 1986.

89. Brauer P, Kochs E, Werner C, et al: Correlation of

transcranial Doppler sonography mean flow velo-

city with cerebral blood flow in patients with

intracranial pathology. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol

10:80-85, 1998.

90. Pindzola RR, Balzer JR, Nemoto EM, et al: Cerebro-

vascular reserve in patients with carotid occlusive

disease assessed by stable xenon-enhanced CT cere-

bral blood flow and transcranial Doppler. Stroke

32:1811-1817, 2001.

91. Chieregato A, Sabia G, Tanfani A, et al: Xenon-CT

and transcranial Doppler in poor-grade or compli-

cated aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhage

patients undergoing aggressive management of

intracranial hypertension. Intensive Care Med

32:1143-1150, 2006.

92. Poeppel TD, Terborg C, Hautzel H, et al: Cerebral

haemodynamics during hypo- and hypercapnia:

Determination with simultaneous

O-butanol-PET

and transcranial Doppler sonography. Nuklearme-

dizin 46:93-100, 2007.

93. Ackerstaff RG, Moons KG, van de Vlasakker CJ, et

al: Association of intraoperative transcranial

Doppler monitoring variables with stroke from

carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 31:1817-1823,

2000.

94. Ogasawara K, Suga Y, Sasaki M, et al: Intraoperative

microemboli and low middle cerebral artery blood

flow velocity are additive in predicting development

of cerebral ischemic events after carotid endarterec-

tomy. Stroke 39:3088-3091, 2008.

95. Mueller M, Behnke S, Walter P, et al: Microembolic

signals and intraoperative stroke in carotid endar-

terectomy. Acta Neurol Scand 97:110-117, 1998.

96. Abbott AL, Levi CR, Stork J, et al: Timing of clini-

cally significant microembolism after carotid

endarterectomy. Cerebrovasc Dis 23:362-367, 2007.

97. Dunne VG, Besser M, MaWJ: Transcranial Doppler

in carotid endarterectomy. J Clin Neurosci 8:140-

145, 2001.

98. Spencer MP: Transcranial Doppler monitoring and

causes of stroke from carotid endarterectomy.

Stroke 28:685-691, 1997.

99. Gaunte ME: Transcranial Doppler: Preventing

stroke during carotid endarterectomy. Ann R Coll

Surg Engl 80:377-387, 1998.

100. Rigamonti A, Scandroglio M, Minicucci F, et al: A

clinical evaluation of near-infrared cerebral oxime-

try in the awake patient to monitor cerebral perfu-

sion during carotid endarterectomy. J Clin Anesth

17:426-430, 2005.

101. Samra SK, Dy EA, Welch K, et al: Evaluation of a

cerebral oximeter as a monitor of cerebral ischemia

during carotid endarterectomy. Anesthesiology

93:964-970, 2000.

102. Calderon-Arnulphi M, Alaraj A, Amin-Janjani S, et

al: Detection of cerebral ischemia in neurovascular

surgery using quantitative frequency-domain near-

infrared spectroscopy. J Neurosurg 106:283-290,

2007.

103. Friedell ML, Clark JM, Graham DA, et al: Cerebral

oximetry does not correlate with electroencephalo-

graphy and somatosensory evoked potentials in

determining the need for shunting during carotid

endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 48:601-606, 2008.

104. Friedman WA, Chadwick GM, Verhoeven FJ, et al:

Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials

during surgery for middle cerebral artery aneu-

rysms. Neurosurgery 29:83, 1991.

105. Mizoi K,Yoshimoto T: Intraoperative monitoring of

the somatosensory evoked potentials and cerebral

blood flow during aneurysm surgery—safety eva-

luation for temporary vascular occlusion. Neurol

Med Chir (Tokyo) 31:318, 1991.

106. Misoi K, Yoshimoto T: Permissible temporary

occlusion time in aneurysm surgery as evaluated by

evoked potential monitoring. Neurosurgery 33:434,

1993.

107. Holland NR: Subcortical strokes from intracranial

aneurysm surgery: Implications for intraoperative

neuromonitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:439,

1998.

108. Schramm J, Zentner J, Pechstein U: Intraoperative

SEP monitoring in aneurysm surgery. Neurol Res

16:20, 1994.

109. Wiedemayer H, Fauser B, Sandalcioglu IE: The

impact of neurophysiological intraoperative moni-

toring on surgical decisions: A critical analysis of

423 cases. J Neurosurg 96:255, 2002.

110. Manninen PH, Patterson S, Lam AM, et al: Evoked

potential monitoring during posterior fossa aneu-

rysm surgery: A comparison of two modalities. Can

J Anaesth 41:92, 1994.

111. Manninen PH, Cuillerier DJ, Gelb AW, et al: Moni-

toring of brain stem function during posterior fossa

surgery. Can J Anaesth 37(4 Pt 2):S23, 1990.

112. Friedman WA, Kaplan BL, Day AL: Evoked poten-

tial monitoring during aneurysm operation: Obser-

vations after fifty cases. Neurosurgery 20:678,

1987.

113. Little JR, Lesser RP, Luders H: Electrophysiological

monitoring during basilar aneurysm operation.

Neurosurgery 20:421, 1987.

114. Frost EA, Booij LH: Anesthesia in the patient for

awake craniotomy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 20:331-

335, 2007.

115. Costello TG, Cormack JR: Anaesthesia for awake

craniotomy: A modern approach. J Clin Neurosci

11:16-19, 2004.

116. Erickson KM, Cole DJ: Anesthetic considerations

for awake craniotomy for epilepsy. Anesthesiol Clin

25:535-555, 2007.

117. Beghi E, Tonini C: Surgery for epilepsy: Assessing

evidence from observational studies. Epilepsy Res

70:97-102, 2006.

118. Kuzniecky R, Devinsky O: Surgery insight: Surgical

management of epilepsy. Nat Clin Pract Neurol

3:673-681, 2007.

119. Quesney LF, Niedermeier E: Electrocorticography.

Niedermeier E, Lopes da Silva F (eds): Electro-

encephalography, 5th ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott

Williams & Wilkins, 1994, pp 769-775.

120. Ramnarayan R, Mackenzie I: Brain-stem auditory

evoked responses during microvascular decom-

pression for trigeminal neuralgia: Predicting

postoperative hearing loss. Neurol India 54:250-

254, 2006.

121. Sindou MP: Microvascular decompression for

primary hemifacial spasm: Importance of intraope-

rative neurophysiological monitoring. Acta Neuro-

chir (Wien) 147:1019-1026, 2005.

122. Brock S, Scaioli V, Ferroli P, Broggi G: Neurovascu-

lar decompression in trigeminal neuralgia: Role of

intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in

the learning period. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg

82:199-206, 2004.

123. Sindou M, Fobé JL, Ciriano D, Fischer C: Hearing

prognosis and intraoperative guidance of brainstem

auditory evoked potential in microvascular decom-

pression. Laryngoscope 102:678-682, 1992.

124. Friedman WA, Kaplan BJ, Gravenstein D, Rhoton

AL Jr: Intraoperative brain-stem auditory evoked

potentials during posterior fossa microvascular

decompression. J Neurosurg 62:552-557, 1985.

125. Khrais T, Sanna M: Hearing preservation surgery in

vestibular schwannoma. J Laryngol Otol 120:366-

370, 2006.

126. Bennett M, Haynes DS: Surgical approaches and

complications in the removal of vestibular schwan-

nomas. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 40:589-609,

2007.

127. Sala F, Manganotti P, Tramontano V, et al: Monito-

ring of motor pathways during brain stem surgery:

What we have achieved and what we still miss? Clin

Neurophysiol 37:399-406, 2007.

128. Maccabee PJ, Pinkhasov EI, Tsairis P, et al: Spinal

and short latency scalp derived somatosensory

evoked potentials during corrective spinal column

surgery. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol

53:P32, 1982.

129. Luederes H, Gurd A, Hahn J, et al: A new technique

for intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord

function: Multichannel recording of spinal cord

and subcortical evoked potentials. Spine 7:110,

1982.

130. Raudzens PA: Intraoperative monitoring of evoked

potentials. Ann N Y Acad Sci 388:308, 1982.

131. McCallum JE, Bennett MH: Electrophysiologic

monitoring of spinal cord function during intraspi-

nal surgery. Surg Forum 26:469, 1975.

132. Grundy BL: Intraoperative monitoring of sensory

evoked potentials.

Nodar RH, Barber C (eds):

Evoked Potentials II. Boston, Butterworth, 1984,

p 624.

133. Spielholz NI, Benjamin MV, Engler GL, et al: Soma-

tosensory evoked potentials during decompression

and stabilization of the spine: Methods and fin-

dings. Spine 4:500, 1979.

134. Halliday AM,Wakefield GS: Cerebral evoked poten-

tials in patients with dissociated sensory loss. J

Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 26:211, 1963.

135. Szilagyi DE, Hageman JH, Smith RF, et al: Spinal

cord damage in surgery of the abdominal aorta.

Surgery 83:38, 1978.

136. Edmonds HL, Paloheimo MPJ, Backman MH, et al:

Transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials for

functional monitoring of motor pathways during

scoliosis surgery. Spine 14:683, 1989.

137. Boyd SG, Rothwell JC, Cowan JMA, et al: A method

of monitoring function in corticospinal pathways

during scoliosis surgery with a note on motor con-

duction velocities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

49:251, 1986.

138. Sloan TB, Janik D, Jameson L: Multimodality moni-

toring of the central nervous system using motor-

evoked potentials. Curr Opin Anesthesiol

21:560-564, 2008.

139. Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke LG, Brid-

well KH: Somatosensory and motor evoked poten-

tial monitoring without a wake-up test during

idiopathic scoliosis surgery: An accepted standard

of care. Spine 23:1392-1400, 1998.

140. Schwartz DM,Auerbach JD, Dormans JP, et al: Neu-

rophysiologic detection of impending spinal cord

injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg

Am 89:2440-2449, 2007.

141. MacDonald DB, Al Zayed Z, Khoudeir I, Stigsby B:

Monitoring scoliosis surgery with combined multi-

ple pulse transcranial electric motor and cortical

somatosensory-evoked potentials from the lower

and upper extremities. Spine 28:194-203, 2003.

142. Elmore JR, Gloviczki P, Harper CM, et al: Failure of

motor evoked potentials to predict neurologic

outcome in experimental thoracic aortic occlusion.

J Vasc Surg 14:131, 1991.

143. Reuter DG, TackerWA, Badylak SF, et al: Correlation

of motor-evoked potential response to ischemic

spinal cord damage. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

104:262, 1992.

144. Dong CC, MacDonald DB, Janusz MT: Intraopera-

tive spinal cord monitoring during descending tho-

racic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery.

Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1873, 2002.

145. Guerit JM, Dion RA: State-of-the-art of neuromo-

nitoring for prevention of immediate and delayed

paraplegia in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta

surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1867, 2002.

146. Jacobs MJ, Elenbaas TW, Schurink GW, et al:

Assessment of spinal cord integrity during thora-

coabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Thorac

Surg 74:S1864, 2002.

Monitorización neurológica

1277

Sección III

Control de la anestesia