Miller Anestesia

147. MacDonald DB, Janusz M: An approach to intrao-

perative neurophysiologic monitoring of thora-

coabdominalaneurysmsurgery.JClinNeurophysiol

19:43, 2002.

148. Meylaerts SA, Jacobs MJ, van Iterson V, et al: Com-

parison of transcranial motor evoked potentials and

somatosensory evoked potentials during thora-

coabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Surg

230:742, 1999.

149. de Haan P, Kalkman CJ, Jacobs MJ: Spinal cord

monitoring with myogenic motor evoked poten-

tials: Early detection of spinal cord ischemia as an

integral part of spinal cord protective strategies

during thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery.Semin

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 10:19, 1998.

150. Shine TS, Harrison BA, De Ruyter ML, et al: Motor

and somatosensory evoked potentials: Their role in

predicting spinal cord ischemia in patients under-

going thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

with regional lumbar epidural cooling. Anesthesio-

logy 108:580-587, 2008.

151. Lases EC, Schepens MA, Haas FJ, et al: Clinical

prospective study of biochemical markers and

evoked potentials for identifying adverse neuro-

logical outcome after thoracic and thoracoabdo-

minal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Anaesth

95:651-661, 2005.

152. Weigang E, Hartert M, Siegenthaler MP, et al: Neu-

rophysiological monitoring during thoracoabdomi-

nal aortic endovascular stent graft implantation.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29:392-396, 2006.

153. Jacobs MJ, Mess W, Mochtar B, et al: The value of

motor evoked potentials in reducing paraplegia

during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair. J Vasc

Surg 43:239-246, 2006.

154. Raynor BL, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al: Correla-

tion between low triggered electromyographic

thresholds and lumbar pedicle screw malposition:

Analysis of 4857 screws. Spine 32:2673-2678,

2007.

155. Shi YB, Binette M, Martin WH, et al: Electrical

stimulation for intraoperative evaluation of tho-

racic pedicle screw placement. Spine 28:595-601,

2003.

156. Leppanen RE: Intraoperative monitoring of seg-

mental spinal nerve root function with free-run and

electrically-triggered electromyography and spinal

cord function with reflexes and F-responses:A posi-

tion statement by the American Society of Neuro-

physiological Monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput

19:437-461, 2005.

157. Shin AY, Spinner RJ, Steinmann SP, Bishop AT:

Adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries. J AmAcad

Orthop Surg 13:382-396, 2005.

158. Harper CM, Daube RJ: Surgical monitoring with

evoked potentials: The Mayo Clinic experience.

Desmedt JE (ed): Neuromonitoring in Surgery.New

York, Elsevier Science, 1989, pp p275.

159. Kline DG, Kim D, Midha R, et al: Management and

results of sciatic nerve injuries: A 24-year expe-

rience. J Neurosurg 89:13, 1998.

160. KimDH,ChoYJ,Tiel RL,et al: Outcomes of surgery

in 1019 brachial plexus lesions treated at Louisiana

State University Health Sciences Center. J Neuro-

surg 98:1005, 2003.

161. Levy WJ: Quantitative analysis of EEG changes

during hypothermia. Anesthesiology 60:291, 1984.

162. Levy WJ, Pantin E, Mehta S, et al: Hypothermia and

the approximate entropy of the electroencephalo-

gram. Anesthesiology 98:53, 2003.

163. Chabot RJ, Gugino LD, Aglio LS, et al: QEEG and

neuropsychological profiles of patients after under-

going cardiopulmonary bypass surgical procedures.

Clin Electroencephalogr 28:98, 1997.

164. Edmonds HL Jr, Griffiths LK, van der Laken J, et al:

Quantitative electroencephalographic monitoring

during myocardial revascularization predicts posto-

perative disorientation and improves outcome. J

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 103:555, 1992.

165. Miller G, Rodichok LD, Baylen BG: EEG changes

during open heart surgery on infants aged 6 months

or less: Relationship to early neurologic morbidity.

Pediatr Neurol 10:124, 1994.

166. Williams GD, Ramamoorthy C: Brain monitoring

and protection during pediatric cardiac surgery.

Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 11:23-33, 2007.

167. Doblar DD: Intraoperative transcranial ultrasonic

monitoring for cardiac and vascular surgery. Semin

Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 8:127-145, 2004.

168. Sakamoto T, Duebener LF, Laussen PC, Jonas RA:

Cerebral ischemia caused by obstructed superior

vena cava cannula is detected by near-infrared

spectroscopy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 18:293-

303, 2004.

169. Kussman BD, Wypij D, DiNardo JA, et al: An eva-

luation of bilateral monitoring of cerebral oxygen

saturation during pediatric cardiac surgery. Anesth

Analg 101:1294-1300, 2005.

170. Murkin JM, Adams SJ, Novick RJ, et al: Monitoring

brain oxygen saturation during coronary bypass

surgery: A randomized prospective study. Anesth

Analg 104:51-58, 2007.

171. Gopinath SP, Robertson CS, Contant CF, et al:

Jugular venous desaturation and outcome after

head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57:717-

723, 1994.

172. Fandino J, Stocker R, Prokop S, et al: Cerebral oxy-

genation and systemic trauma related factors deter-

mining neurological outcome after brain injury. J

Clin Neurosci 7:226-233, 2000.

173. Cormio M, Valadka AB, Robertson CS: Elevated

jugular venous oxygen saturation after severe head

injury. J Neurosurg 90:9-15, 1999.

174. Cremer OL,van Dijk GW,vanWensen E,et al: Effect

of intracranial pressure monitoring and targeted

intensive care on functional outcome after severe

head injury. Crit Care Med 33:2207-2213, 2005.

175. Stiefel MF, Udoetuk JD, Spiotta AM, et al: Conven-

tional neurocritical care and cerebral oxygenation

after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 105:568-

575, 2006.

176. Fortune JB,Feustel PJ,Graca L,et al: Effect of hyper-

ventilation,mannitol,and ventriculostomy drainage

on cerebral blood flow after head injury. J Trauma

39:1091, 1995.

177. Skippen P, Seear M, Poskitt K, et al: Effect of hyper-

ventilation on regional cerebral blood flow in head-

injured children. Crit Care Med 25:1402, 1997.

178. Imberti R, Bellinzona G, Langer M: Cerebral tissue

and Sjvo

changes during moderate hyperven-

tilation in patients with severe traumatic brain

injury. J Neurosurg 96:97, 2002.

179. Coles JP, Minhas PS, Fryer TD, et al: Effect of hyper-

ventilation on cerebral blood flow in traumatic head

injury: Clinical relevance and monitoring correla-

tes. Crit Care Med 30:1950, 2002.

180. van den BrinkWA,van Santbrink H,Steyerberg EW,

et al: Brain oxygen tension in severe head injury.

Neurosurgery 46:868-876, 2000.

181. Stiefel MF, Spiotta A, Gracias VH, et al: Reduced

mortality rate in patients with severe traumatic

brain injury treated with brain tissue oxygen moni-

toring. J Neurosurg 103:805-811, 2005.

182. Steiner LA, Andrews PJ: Monitoring the injured

brain: ICP and CBF. Br J Anaesth 97:26-38, 2006.

183. Suarez JI, Qureshi AI, Yahia AB, et al: Symptomatic

vasospasm diagnosis after subarachnoid hemorr-

hage: Evaluation of transcranial Doppler ultra-

sound and cerebral angiography as related to

compromised vascular distribution. Crit Care Med

30:1348, 2002.

184. Topcuoglu MA, Pryor JC, Ogilvy CS, et al: Cere-

bral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorr-

hage. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 4:3731,

2002.

185. Jarus-Dziedzic K, Juniewicz H, Wronski J, et al: The

relation between cerebral blood flow velocities as

measured by TCD and the incidence of delayed

ischemic deficits: A prospective study after subara-

chnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Res 24:5822, 2002.

186. Aaslid R: Transcranial Doppler assessment of cere-

bral vasospasm. Eur J Ultrasound 16:3, 2002.

187. Mascia L, Fedorko L, ter Brugge K, et al: The accu-

racy of transcranial Doppler to detect vasospasm in

patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorr-

hage. Intensive Care Med 29:1088, 2003.

188. Sloan MA, Haley EC, Kassell NF, et al: Sensitivity

and specificity of transcranial Doppler ultrasono-

graphy in the diagnosis of vasospasm following

subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 39:1514,

1989.

189. Sekhar LN, Wechsler LR, Yonas H, et al: Value of

transcranial Doppler examination in the diagnosis

of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorr-

hage. Neurosurgery 22:813, 1988.

190. Vespa PM, Nenov V, Nuwer MR: Continuous EEG

monitoring in the intensive care unit: Early findings

and clinical efficacy. J Clin Neurophysiol 16:1-13,

1999.

191. Bricolo A, Turazzi S, Faccioli F, et al: Clinical appli-

cation of compressed spectral array in long-term

EEG monitoring of comatose patients. Electroen-

cephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45:211-225, 1978.

192. Gutling E, Gonser A, Imhof HG, Landis T: EEG

reactivity in the prognosis of severe head injury.

Neurology 45:915-918, 1995.

193. Alexandre A, Rubini L, Nertempi P, Farinello C:

Sleep alterations during post-traumatic coma as a

possible predictor of cognitive defects. Acta Neuro-

chir Suppl (Wien) 28:188-192, 1979.

194. Bergamasco B, Bergamini L, Doriguzzi T, Fabiani D:

EEG sleep patterns as a prognostic criterion in post-

traumatic coma. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro-

physiol 24:347-374, 1968.

195. Winer JW, Rosenwasser RH, Jimenez F: Electroen-

cephalographic activity and serum and cerebrospi-

nal fluid pentobarbital levels in determining the

therapeutic end point during barbiturate coma.

Neurosurgery 29:739-741, 1991.

196. Facco E, Munari M, Baratto F, et al: Multimodality

evoked potentials (auditory, somatosensory and

motor) in coma. Neurophysiol Clin 23:237-258, 1993.

197. Pohlmann-Eden B,Dingethal K,Bender HJ,Koelfen

W: How reliable is the predictive value of SEP

(somatosensory evoked potentials) patterns in

severe brain damage with special regard to the bila-

teral loss of cortical responses? Intensive Care Med

23:301-308, 1997.

198. Ruiz-Lopez MJ, Martinez de Azagra A, Serrano A,

Casado-Flores J: Brain death and evoked potentials

in pediatric patients. Crit Care Med 27:412-416,

1999.

199. Goodwin SR, FriedmanWA, Bellefleur M: Is it time

to use evoked potentials to predict outcome in

comatose children and adults? Crit Care Med

19:518-524, 1991.

200. Morgalla MH, Bauer J, Ritz R, Tatagiba M: Coma:

The prognostic value of evoked potentials in

patients after traumatic brain injury. Anaesthesist

55:760-768, 2006.

201. Nuwer MR: Electroencephalograms and evoked

potentials: Monitoring cerebral function in the neu-

rosurgical intensive care unit. Neurosurg Clin

North Am 5:647-659, 1994.

202. Lew HL, Poole JH, Castaneda A, et al: Prognostic

value of evoked and event-related potentials in

moderate to severe brain injury. J Head Trauma

Rehabil 21:350-360, 2006.

203. Carter BG, Butt W: Review of the use of somatosen-

sory evoked potentials in the prediction of outcome

after severe brain injury. Crit Care Med 29:178-186,

2001.

204. Carter BG, Butt W: Are somatosensory evoked

potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe

brain injury? A systematic review. Intensive Care

Med 31:765-775, 2005.

205. Fischer C, Luaute J: Evoked potentials for the pre-

diction of vegetative state in the acute stage of coma.

Neuropsychol Rehabil 15:372-380, 2005.

206. Petty GW, Mohr JP, Pedley T, et al: The role of trans-

cranial Doppler in confirming brain death. Neuro-

logy 40:300, 1990.

207. Rosen I, Hagerdal M: Electroencephalographic

study of children during ketamine anesthesia. Acta

Anaesthesiol Scand 20:32, 1976.

208. La Marca S, Lozito RJ, Dunn RW: Cognitive and

EEG recovery following bolus intravenous adminis-

tration of anesthetic agents. Psychopharmacol

(Berl) 120:426, 1995.

1278

Control de la anestesia

III