147. MacDonald DB, Janusz M: An approach to intrao-
perative neurophysiologic monitoring of thora-
coabdominalaneurysmsurgery.JClinNeurophysiol
19:43, 2002.
148. Meylaerts SA, Jacobs MJ, van Iterson V, et al: Com-
parison of transcranial motor evoked potentials and
somatosensory evoked potentials during thora-
coabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Surg
230:742, 1999.
149. de Haan P, Kalkman CJ, Jacobs MJ: Spinal cord
monitoring with myogenic motor evoked poten-
tials: Early detection of spinal cord ischemia as an
integral part of spinal cord protective strategies
during thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery.Semin
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 10:19, 1998.
150. Shine TS, Harrison BA, De Ruyter ML, et al: Motor
and somatosensory evoked potentials: Their role in
predicting spinal cord ischemia in patients under-
going thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair
with regional lumbar epidural cooling. Anesthesio-
logy 108:580-587, 2008.
151. Lases EC, Schepens MA, Haas FJ, et al: Clinical
prospective study of biochemical markers and
evoked potentials for identifying adverse neuro-
logical outcome after thoracic and thoracoabdo-
minal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Anaesth
95:651-661, 2005.
152. Weigang E, Hartert M, Siegenthaler MP, et al: Neu-
rophysiological monitoring during thoracoabdomi-
nal aortic endovascular stent graft implantation.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29:392-396, 2006.
153. Jacobs MJ, Mess W, Mochtar B, et al: The value of
motor evoked potentials in reducing paraplegia
during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair. J Vasc
Surg 43:239-246, 2006.
154. Raynor BL, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al: Correla-
tion between low triggered electromyographic
thresholds and lumbar pedicle screw malposition:
Analysis of 4857 screws. Spine 32:2673-2678,
2007.
155. Shi YB, Binette M, Martin WH, et al: Electrical
stimulation for intraoperative evaluation of tho-
racic pedicle screw placement. Spine 28:595-601,
2003.
156. Leppanen RE: Intraoperative monitoring of seg-
mental spinal nerve root function with free-run and
electrically-triggered electromyography and spinal
cord function with reflexes and F-responses:A posi-
tion statement by the American Society of Neuro-
physiological Monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput
19:437-461, 2005.
157. Shin AY, Spinner RJ, Steinmann SP, Bishop AT:
Adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries. J AmAcad
Orthop Surg 13:382-396, 2005.
158. Harper CM, Daube RJ: Surgical monitoring with
evoked potentials: The Mayo Clinic experience.
In
Desmedt JE (ed): Neuromonitoring in Surgery.New
York, Elsevier Science, 1989, pp p275.
159. Kline DG, Kim D, Midha R, et al: Management and
results of sciatic nerve injuries: A 24-year expe-
rience. J Neurosurg 89:13, 1998.
160. KimDH,ChoYJ,Tiel RL,et al: Outcomes of surgery
in 1019 brachial plexus lesions treated at Louisiana
State University Health Sciences Center. J Neuro-
surg 98:1005, 2003.
161. Levy WJ: Quantitative analysis of EEG changes
during hypothermia. Anesthesiology 60:291, 1984.
162. Levy WJ, Pantin E, Mehta S, et al: Hypothermia and
the approximate entropy of the electroencephalo-
gram. Anesthesiology 98:53, 2003.
163. Chabot RJ, Gugino LD, Aglio LS, et al: QEEG and
neuropsychological profiles of patients after under-
going cardiopulmonary bypass surgical procedures.
Clin Electroencephalogr 28:98, 1997.
164. Edmonds HL Jr, Griffiths LK, van der Laken J, et al:
Quantitative electroencephalographic monitoring
during myocardial revascularization predicts posto-
perative disorientation and improves outcome. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 103:555, 1992.
165. Miller G, Rodichok LD, Baylen BG: EEG changes
during open heart surgery on infants aged 6 months
or less: Relationship to early neurologic morbidity.
Pediatr Neurol 10:124, 1994.
166. Williams GD, Ramamoorthy C: Brain monitoring
and protection during pediatric cardiac surgery.
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 11:23-33, 2007.
167. Doblar DD: Intraoperative transcranial ultrasonic
monitoring for cardiac and vascular surgery. Semin
Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 8:127-145, 2004.
168. Sakamoto T, Duebener LF, Laussen PC, Jonas RA:
Cerebral ischemia caused by obstructed superior
vena cava cannula is detected by near-infrared
spectroscopy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 18:293-
303, 2004.
169. Kussman BD, Wypij D, DiNardo JA, et al: An eva-
luation of bilateral monitoring of cerebral oxygen
saturation during pediatric cardiac surgery. Anesth
Analg 101:1294-1300, 2005.
170. Murkin JM, Adams SJ, Novick RJ, et al: Monitoring
brain oxygen saturation during coronary bypass
surgery: A randomized prospective study. Anesth
Analg 104:51-58, 2007.
171. Gopinath SP, Robertson CS, Contant CF, et al:
Jugular venous desaturation and outcome after
head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57:717-
723, 1994.
172. Fandino J, Stocker R, Prokop S, et al: Cerebral oxy-
genation and systemic trauma related factors deter-
mining neurological outcome after brain injury. J
Clin Neurosci 7:226-233, 2000.
173. Cormio M, Valadka AB, Robertson CS: Elevated
jugular venous oxygen saturation after severe head
injury. J Neurosurg 90:9-15, 1999.
174. Cremer OL,van Dijk GW,vanWensen E,et al: Effect
of intracranial pressure monitoring and targeted
intensive care on functional outcome after severe
head injury. Crit Care Med 33:2207-2213, 2005.
175. Stiefel MF, Udoetuk JD, Spiotta AM, et al: Conven-
tional neurocritical care and cerebral oxygenation
after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 105:568-
575, 2006.
176. Fortune JB,Feustel PJ,Graca L,et al: Effect of hyper-
ventilation,mannitol,and ventriculostomy drainage
on cerebral blood flow after head injury. J Trauma
39:1091, 1995.
177. Skippen P, Seear M, Poskitt K, et al: Effect of hyper-
ventilation on regional cerebral blood flow in head-
injured children. Crit Care Med 25:1402, 1997.
178. Imberti R, Bellinzona G, Langer M: Cerebral tissue
PO
2
and Sjvo
2
changes during moderate hyperven-
tilation in patients with severe traumatic brain
injury. J Neurosurg 96:97, 2002.
179. Coles JP, Minhas PS, Fryer TD, et al: Effect of hyper-
ventilation on cerebral blood flow in traumatic head
injury: Clinical relevance and monitoring correla-
tes. Crit Care Med 30:1950, 2002.
180. van den BrinkWA,van Santbrink H,Steyerberg EW,
et al: Brain oxygen tension in severe head injury.
Neurosurgery 46:868-876, 2000.
181. Stiefel MF, Spiotta A, Gracias VH, et al: Reduced
mortality rate in patients with severe traumatic
brain injury treated with brain tissue oxygen moni-
toring. J Neurosurg 103:805-811, 2005.
182. Steiner LA, Andrews PJ: Monitoring the injured
brain: ICP and CBF. Br J Anaesth 97:26-38, 2006.
183. Suarez JI, Qureshi AI, Yahia AB, et al: Symptomatic
vasospasm diagnosis after subarachnoid hemorr-
hage: Evaluation of transcranial Doppler ultra-
sound and cerebral angiography as related to
compromised vascular distribution. Crit Care Med
30:1348, 2002.
184. Topcuoglu MA, Pryor JC, Ogilvy CS, et al: Cere-
bral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorr-
hage. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 4:3731,
2002.
185. Jarus-Dziedzic K, Juniewicz H, Wronski J, et al: The
relation between cerebral blood flow velocities as
measured by TCD and the incidence of delayed
ischemic deficits: A prospective study after subara-
chnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Res 24:5822, 2002.
186. Aaslid R: Transcranial Doppler assessment of cere-
bral vasospasm. Eur J Ultrasound 16:3, 2002.
187. Mascia L, Fedorko L, ter Brugge K, et al: The accu-
racy of transcranial Doppler to detect vasospasm in
patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorr-
hage. Intensive Care Med 29:1088, 2003.
188. Sloan MA, Haley EC, Kassell NF, et al: Sensitivity
and specificity of transcranial Doppler ultrasono-
graphy in the diagnosis of vasospasm following
subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 39:1514,
1989.
189. Sekhar LN, Wechsler LR, Yonas H, et al: Value of
transcranial Doppler examination in the diagnosis
of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorr-
hage. Neurosurgery 22:813, 1988.
190. Vespa PM, Nenov V, Nuwer MR: Continuous EEG
monitoring in the intensive care unit: Early findings
and clinical efficacy. J Clin Neurophysiol 16:1-13,
1999.
191. Bricolo A, Turazzi S, Faccioli F, et al: Clinical appli-
cation of compressed spectral array in long-term
EEG monitoring of comatose patients. Electroen-
cephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45:211-225, 1978.
192. Gutling E, Gonser A, Imhof HG, Landis T: EEG
reactivity in the prognosis of severe head injury.
Neurology 45:915-918, 1995.
193. Alexandre A, Rubini L, Nertempi P, Farinello C:
Sleep alterations during post-traumatic coma as a
possible predictor of cognitive defects. Acta Neuro-
chir Suppl (Wien) 28:188-192, 1979.
194. Bergamasco B, Bergamini L, Doriguzzi T, Fabiani D:
EEG sleep patterns as a prognostic criterion in post-
traumatic coma. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro-
physiol 24:347-374, 1968.
195. Winer JW, Rosenwasser RH, Jimenez F: Electroen-
cephalographic activity and serum and cerebrospi-
nal fluid pentobarbital levels in determining the
therapeutic end point during barbiturate coma.
Neurosurgery 29:739-741, 1991.
196. Facco E, Munari M, Baratto F, et al: Multimodality
evoked potentials (auditory, somatosensory and
motor) in coma. Neurophysiol Clin 23:237-258, 1993.
197. Pohlmann-Eden B,Dingethal K,Bender HJ,Koelfen
W: How reliable is the predictive value of SEP
(somatosensory evoked potentials) patterns in
severe brain damage with special regard to the bila-
teral loss of cortical responses? Intensive Care Med
23:301-308, 1997.
198. Ruiz-Lopez MJ, Martinez de Azagra A, Serrano A,
Casado-Flores J: Brain death and evoked potentials
in pediatric patients. Crit Care Med 27:412-416,
1999.
199. Goodwin SR, FriedmanWA, Bellefleur M: Is it time
to use evoked potentials to predict outcome in
comatose children and adults? Crit Care Med
19:518-524, 1991.
200. Morgalla MH, Bauer J, Ritz R, Tatagiba M: Coma:
The prognostic value of evoked potentials in
patients after traumatic brain injury. Anaesthesist
55:760-768, 2006.
201. Nuwer MR: Electroencephalograms and evoked
potentials: Monitoring cerebral function in the neu-
rosurgical intensive care unit. Neurosurg Clin
North Am 5:647-659, 1994.
202. Lew HL, Poole JH, Castaneda A, et al: Prognostic
value of evoked and event-related potentials in
moderate to severe brain injury. J Head Trauma
Rehabil 21:350-360, 2006.
203. Carter BG, Butt W: Review of the use of somatosen-
sory evoked potentials in the prediction of outcome
after severe brain injury. Crit Care Med 29:178-186,
2001.
204. Carter BG, Butt W: Are somatosensory evoked
potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe
brain injury? A systematic review. Intensive Care
Med 31:765-775, 2005.
205. Fischer C, Luaute J: Evoked potentials for the pre-
diction of vegetative state in the acute stage of coma.
Neuropsychol Rehabil 15:372-380, 2005.
206. Petty GW, Mohr JP, Pedley T, et al: The role of trans-
cranial Doppler in confirming brain death. Neuro-
logy 40:300, 1990.
207. Rosen I, Hagerdal M: Electroencephalographic
study of children during ketamine anesthesia. Acta
Anaesthesiol Scand 20:32, 1976.
208. La Marca S, Lozito RJ, Dunn RW: Cognitive and
EEG recovery following bolus intravenous adminis-
tration of anesthetic agents. Psychopharmacol
(Berl) 120:426, 1995.
1278
Control de la anestesia
III