Miller Anestesia

30. Brull SJ, Silverman DG: Pulse width, stimulus inten-

sity, electrode placement, and polarity during

assessment of neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology

83:702, 1995.

31. Smith CE, Donati F, Bevan DR: Potency of succinyl-

choline at the diaphragm and the adductor pollicis

muscle. Anesth Analg 67:625, 1988.

32. Donati F, Antzaka C, Bevan DR: Potency of pancuro-

nium at the diaphragm and the adductor pollicis

muscle in humans. Anesthesiology 65:1, 1986.

33. Pansard J-L, Chauvin M, Lebrault C, et al: Effect of an

intubating dose of succinylcholine and atracurium on

the diaphragm and the adductor pollicis muscle in

humans. Anesthesiology 67:326, 1987.

34. Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F: The corrugator super-

cilii, not orbicularis oculi, reflects rocuronium neuro-

muscular blockade at the laryngeal adductor muscles.

Anesthesiology 95:96, 2001.

35. Donati F, Meistelman C, Plaud B: Vecuronium neuro-

muscular blockade at the diaphragm, the orbicularis

oculi, and adductor pollicis muscles. Anesthesiology

73:870, 1990.

36. Rimaniol JM, Dhonneur G, Sperry L, et al: A compa-

rison of the neuromuscular blocking effects of atra-

curium, mivacurium, and vecuronium on the

adductor pollicis and the orbicularis oculi muscle in

humans. Anesth Analg 83:808, 1996.

37. Isono S,Ide T,Kochi T,et al: Effects of partial paralysis

on the swallowing reflex in conscious humans. Anes-

thesiology 75:980, 1991.

38. Pavlin EG, Holle R, Schone R: Recovery of airway

protection compared with ventilation in humans

after paralysis with curare. Anesthesiology 70:381,

1989.

39. D’Honneur G, Guignard B, Slavov V, et al: Compari-

son of the neuromuscular blocking effect of atracu-

rium and vecuronium on the adductor pollicis and

the geniohyoid muscle in humans. Anesthesiology

82:649, 1995.

40. Eriksson LI, Sundman E, Olsson R, et al: Functional

assessment of the pharynx at rest and during

swallowing in partially paralyzed humans. Anesthe-

siology 87:1035, 1997.

41. Kirov K, Motamed C, Ndoko S-K, et al: TOF count at

corrugator supercilii reflects abdominal muscles

relaxation better than at adductor pollicis. Br J

Anaesth 98:611, 2007.

42. Kern SE, Johnson JO, Orr JA, et al: Clinical analysis of

the flexor hallucis brevis as an alternative site for

monitoring neuromuscular block from mivacurium.

J Clin Anesth 9:383, 1997.

43. Saitoh Y, Fujii Y, Takahashi K, et al: Recovery of post-

tetanic count and train-of-four responses at the great

toe and thumb. Anaesthesia 53:244, 1998.

44. Lee GC, Iyengar S, Szenohradszky J, et al: Improving

the design of muscle relaxant studies. Anesthesiology

86:48, 1997.

45. Hemmerling TM, Schurr C, Walter S, et al: A new

method of monitoring the effect of muscle relaxants

on laryngeal muscle using surface laryngeal electrom-

yography. Anesth Analg 90:494, 2000.

46. Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Wolf T, et al: Intramus-

cular versus surface electromyography of the dia-

phragm for determining neuromuscular blockade.

Anesth Analg 92:106, 2001.

47. Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Hanusa C, et al: The

lumbar paravertebral region provides a novel site to

assess neuromuscular block at the diaphragm. Can J

Anaesth 48:356, 2001.

48. Engbæk J, Skovgaard LT, Fries B, et al: Monitoring of

neuromuscular transmission by electromyography

(II). Evoked compound EMG area, amplitude and

duration compared to mechanical twitch recording

during onset and recovery of pancuronium-induced

blockade in the cat. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 37:788,

1993.

49. Kopman AF: The relationship of evoked electromyo-

graphic and mechanical responses following atracu-

rium in humans. Anesthesiology 63:208, 1985.

50. Engbæk J, Østergaard D, Viby-Mogensen J: Clinical

recovery and train-of-four ratio measured mechani-

cally and electromyographically following atracu-

rium. Anesthesiology 71:391, 1989.

51. Viby-Mogensen J, Jensen E, Werner M, et al: Measu-

rement of acceleration: A new method of monitoring

neuromuscular function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand

32:45, 1988.

52. Jensen E, Viby-Mogensen J, Bang U: The accelero-

graph: A new neuromuscular transmission monitor.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 32:49, 1988.

53. Werner MU, Kirkegaard Nielsen H, May O, Djernes

M: Assessment of neuromuscular transmission by the

evoked acceleration response. An evaluation of the

accuracy of the acceleration transducer in compari-

son with a force displacement transducer.Acta Anaes-

thesiol Scand 32:395, 1988.

54. May O, Kirkegaard Nielsen H,Werner MU: The acce-

leration transducer—an assessment of its precision in

comparison with a force displacement transducer.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 32:239, 1988.

55. McCluskey A, Meakin G, Hopkinson JM, et al: A

comparison of acceleromyography and mechanom-

yography for determination of the dose-response

curve of rocuronium in children.Anaesthesia 52:345,

1997.

56. Kirkegaard-Nielsen H, Helbo-Hansen HS, Pedersen

SH, et al: New equipment for neuromuscular trans-

mission monitoring:A comparison of the TOF-Guard

with the Myograph 2000. J Clin Monitor Comput

14:19, 1998.

57. Eikermann M, Groeben H, Husing J, et al: Predictive

value of mechanomyography and accelerometry for

pulmonary function in partially paralyzed volunteers.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 48:365, 2004.

58. Samet A, Capron F, Alla F, et al: Single acceleromyo-

graphic train-of-four, 100-hertz tetanus or double-

burst stimulation: Which test performs better to

detect residual paralysis? Anesthesiology 102:51,

2005.

59. Eikermann M, Groeben H, Hüsing J, et al: Accelero-

metry of adductor pollicis muscle predicts recovery

of respiratory function from neuromuscular bloc-

kade. Anesthesiology 98:1133, 2003.

60. Capron F, Alla F, Hottier C, et al: Can acceleromyo-

graphy detect low levels of residual paralysis? A pro-

bability approach to detect a mechanomyographic

train-of-four ratio of 0.9. Anesthesiology 100:1119,

2004.

61. Mortensen CR, Berg H, El-Mahdy A, et al: Periopera-

tive monitoring of neuromuscular transmission using

acceleromyography prevents residual neuromuscular

block following pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol

Scand 39:797, 1995.

62. Gätke MR, Viby-Mogensen J, Rosenstock C, et al:

Postoperative muscle paralysis after rocuronium: Less

residual block when acceleromyography is used. Acta

Anaesthesiol Scand 46:207, 2002.

63. Gätke MR, Larsen PB, Engbæk J, et al: Acceleromyo-

graphy of the orbicularis oculi muscle. I: Significance

of the electrode position. Acta Anesthesiol Scand

46:1124, 2002.

64. Larsen PB, Gätke MR, Fredensborg BB, et al: Accele-

romyography of the orbicularis oculi muscle.II: Com-

paring the orbicularis oculi and adductor pollicis

muscles. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 46:1131, 2002.

65. Kern SE, Johnson JO, Westenkow DR, et al: An effec-

tiveness study of a new piezoelectric sensor for train-

of-four measurement. Anesth Analg 78:978, 1994.

66. Pelgrims K, Vanacker B: Comparative study of the

TOF-ratio measured by the ParaGraph versus the

TOF-Guard, with and without thumb repositioning.

Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 52:297, 2001.

67. Dahaba AA, von Klobucar F, Rehak PH, et al: The

neuromuscular transmission module versus the

relaxometer mechanomyograph for neuromuscular

block monitoring. Anesth Analg 94:591, 2002.

68. Barry DT: Muscle sounds from evoked twitches in the

hand. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72:573, 1991.

69. Dascalu A, Geller E, Moalem Y, et al: Acoustic moni-

toring of intraoperative neuromuscular block. Br J

Anaesth 83:405, 1999.

70. Hemmerling TM, Donati F, Beaulieu P, et al: Pho-

nomyography of the corrugator supercilii muscle:

Signal characteristics, best recording site and com-

parison with acceleromyography. Br J Anaesth

88:389, 2002.

71. Hemmerling TM, Babin D, Donati F: Phonomyogra-

phy as a novel method to determine neuromuscular

blockade at the laryngeal adductor muscles. Anesthe-

siology 98:359, 2003.

72. Trager G, Michaud G, Deschamps S, et al: Compari-

son of phonomyography, kinemyography and mecha-

nomyography for neuromuscular monitoring. Can J

Anaesth 53:103, 2006.

73. Gibson FM, Mirakhur RK, Clarke RSJ, et al: Quanti-

fication of train-of-four responses during recovery of

block from non-depolarizing muscle relaxants. Acta

Anaesthesiol Scand 31:655, 1987.

74. O’Hara DA, Fragen RJ, Shanks CA: Comparison of

visual and measured train-of-four recovery after

vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade using

two anaesthetic techniques. Br J Anaesth 58:1300,

1986.

75. Engbæk J, Østergaard D, Theil Skovgaard L, et al:

Reversal of intense neuromuscular blockade following

infusion of atracurium. Anesthesiology 72:803, 1990.

76. Kopman AF,Yee PS, Neuman GG: Relationship of the

train-of-four fade ratio to clinical signs and symp-

toms of residual paralysis in awake volunteers. Anes-

thesiology 86:765, 1997.

77. Ali HH, Wilson RS, Savarese JJ, et al: The effect of

tubocurarine on indirectly elicited train-of-four

muscle response and respiratory measurements in

humans. Br J Anaesth 47:570, 1975.

78. Ali HH, Utting JE, Gray C: Quantitative assessment

of residual antidepolarizing block (part I). Br J

Anaesth 43:473, 1971.

79. Brand JB, Cullen DJ, Wilson NE, et al: Spontaneous

recovery from non-depolarizing neuromuscular bloc-

kade: Correlation between clinical and evoked res-

ponses. Anesth Analg 56:55, 1977.

80. Eriksson LI, Lennmarken C, Wyon N, et al: Attenua-

ted ventilatory response to hypoxaemia at vecuro-

nium-induced partial neuromuscular block. Acta

Anaesthesiol Scand 36:710, 1992.

81. Eriksson LI, Sato M, Severinghaus JW: Effect of a

vecuronium-induced partial neuromuscular block on

hypoxic ventilatory response. Anesthesiology 78:693,

1993.

82. Berg H, Viby-Mogensen J, Roed J, et al: Residual neu-

romuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative

pulmonary complications. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand

41:1095, 1997.

83. Wyon N, Joensen H, Yamamoto Y, et al: Carotid body

chemoreceptor function is impaired by vecuronium

during hypoxia. Anesthesiology 89:1471, 1999.

84. Sundman E,Witt H,Olsson R,et al: The incidence and

mechanism of pharyngeal and upper esophagus dys-

function in partially paralyzed humans. Anesthesio-

logy 92:997, 2000.

85. Jonsson M, Kim C, Yamamoto Y, et al: Atracurium

and vecuronium block nicotine-induced carotid

body responses. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 94:117,

2002.

86. Eikerman M, Vogt FM, Herbstreit F, et al: The predis-

position to inspiratory upper airway collapse during

partial neuromuscular blockade. Am J Respir Crit

Care Med 175:9, 2007.

87. Shorten GD, Merk H: Perioperative train-of-four

monitoring and residual curarization. Can J Anaesth

42:711, 1995.

88. Kopman AF, Ng J, Zank LM, et al: Residual postope-

rative paralysis. Pancuronium versus mivacurium,

does it matter? Anesthesiology 85:1253, 1996.

89. Naguib M, Kopman AF, Ensor JE: Neuromuscular

monitoring and postoperative curarization: A meta-

analysis. Br J Anaesth 98:302, 2007.

90. Viby-Mogensen J, Claudius C, Eriksson LI: Neuro-

muscular monitoring and postoperative residual

curarization. Br J Anaesth 99:297, 2007.

91. Heier T, Caldwell JE, Sessler DI, et al: The effect of

local surface and central cooling on adductor pollicis

twitch tension during nitrous oxide/isoflurane and

nitrous oxide/fentanyl anesthesia in humans. Anes-

thesiology 72:807, 1990.

92. Eriksson LI, Lennmarken C, Jensen E, et al: Twitch

tension and train-of-four ratio during prolonged neu-

romuscular monitoring at different peripheral tempe-

ratures. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 35:247, 1991.

1296

Control de la anestesia

III