Miller Anestesia

1374 / 2894

1374 Control de la anestesia III
ninguna excusa para la aplicación de procedimientos diseñados
defectuosamente cuando está en riesgo una vida humana .
Advertencias
Durante la última década se han desarrollado numerosos dispositi-
vos para el control de las vías respiratorias. Hemos intentado incluir
los más importantes, pero es posible que hayamos omitido alguno
por error. La omisión de cualquier dispositivo no implica que no sea
útil en el tratamiento clínico.Con regularidad aparecen en el mercado
dispositivos nuevos, y los lectores deben investigarlo.
Declaración de interés
El autor ha recibido derechos de autor por las ventas del laringos-
copio Henderson.
Agradecimientos
Quisiera agradecer las críticas útiles que me han hecho muchos
compañeros. A Michelle McNicol, que trabajó a un alto nivel para
crear dibujos nuevos.
Bibliografía
1. Lee LA, Domino KB: The Closed Claims Project.
Has it influenced anesthetic practice and outcome?
Anesthesiol Clin North Am 20:485–501, 2002.
2. Fundingsland BW, Benumof JL: Difficulty using a
laryngeal mask airway in a patient with lingual
tonsilar hyperplasia. Anesthesiology 84:1265–1266,
1996.
3. Ovassapian A, Glassenberg R, Randel GI, et al: The
unexpected difficult airway and lingual tonsil
hyperplasia: A case series and a review of the litera-
ture. Anesthesiology 97:124–132, 2002.
4. Hiong YT, Fung CF, Sudhaman DA: Arytenoid
s
Intensive Care 24:609–610, 1996.
5. Wason R, Gupta P, Gogia AR: Bilateral adductor
vocal cord paresis following endotracheal intuba-
tion for general anesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care
32:417–418, 2004.
6. American Society of Anesthesiologists: Task Force
on Management of the Difficult Airway: Practice
guidelines for management of the difficult airway.
An updated report by the American Society of Anes-
thesiologists Task Force onManagement of the Diffi-
cult Airway. Anesthesiology 98:1269–1277, 2003.
7. El-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, et al:
Preoperative airway assessment: Predictive value of
a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg 82:1197–
1204, 1996.
8. Karkouti K, Rose DK,Wigglesworth D, Cohen MM:
Predicting difficult intubation: A multivariable
analysis. Can J Anaesth 47:730–739, 2000.
9. Rosenstock C, Gillesberg I, Gatke MR, et al: Inter-
observer agreement of tests used for prediction of
difficult laryngoscopy/tracheal intubation.ActaAnaesthesiol Scand 49:1057–1062, 2005.
10. Rose DK, Cohen MM: The airway: Problems and
predictions in 18,500 patients. Can J Anaesth
41:372–383, 1994.
11. Lee A, Fan LT, Gin T, et al: A systematic review
(meta-analysis) of the accuracy of the Mallampati
tests to predict the difficult airway. Anesth Analg
102:1867–1878, 2006.
12. Owen H, Waddell-Smith I: Dental trauma associa-
ted with anaesthesia.Anaesth Intensive Care 28:133–
145, 2000.
13. Randell T: Prediction of difficult intubation. Acta
Anaesthesiol Scand 40:1016–1023, 1996.
14. Ezri T,Weisenberg M,KhazinV,et al: Difficult laryn-
goscopy: Incidence and predictors in patients
undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery versus
general surgery patients.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
17:321–324, 2003.
15. Kheterpal S, Han R, Tremper KK, et al: Incidence
and predictors of difficult and impossible mask ven-
tilation. Anesthesiology 105:885–891, 2006.
16. Arai YC, Fukunaga K, Hirota S, Fujimoto S: The
effects of chin lift and jaw thrust while in the lateral
position on stridor score in anesthetized children with
adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Anesth Analg 99:1638–
1641, 2004.
17. Hillman DR,Platt PR,Eastwood PR:The upper airway
during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 91:31–39, 2003.
18.
a case series and review. Anaesth Intensive Care
28:72–76, 2000.
19. Dixon BJ, Dixon JB, Carden JR, et al: Preoxygena-
tion is more effective in the 25 degrees head-up
position than in the supine position in severely
obese patients: A randomized controlled study.
Anesthesiology 102:1110–1115, 2005.
20. Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, et al: Positive end-
expiratory pressure during induction of general
anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea
in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg 100:580–
584, 2005.
21. Julliac B, Guehl D, Chopin F, et al: Risk factors for
the occurrence of electroencephalogram abnorma-
lities during induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane
in nonepileptic patients. Anesthesiology 106:243–
251, 2007.
22. Bourgain JL, Billard V, Cros AM: Pressure support
ventilation during fibreoptic intubation under pro-
pofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 98:136–140, 2007.
23. Mencke T, Echternach M, Kleinschmidt S, et al:
Laryngeal morbidity and quality of tracheal intuba-
tion: A randomized controlled trial.Anesthesiology
98:1049–1056, 2003.
24. Donati F: Tracheal intubation: Unconsciousness,
analgesia and muscle relaxation. Can J Anaesth
50:99–103, 2003.
25. Bennett JA, Abrams JT, Van Riper DF, Horrow JC:
Difficult or impossible ventilation after sufentanil-
induced anesthesia is caused primarily by vocal
cord closure. Anesthesiology 87:1070–1074, 1997.
26. Adnet F, Baillard C, Borron SW, et al: Randomized
study comparing the “sniffing position” with simple
head extension for laryngoscopic view in elective
surgery patients. Anesthesiology 95:836–841, 2001.
27. Crosby ET. Complete airway obstruction Can J
Anaesth 46:99–104, 1999.
28. Pandey CK, Raza M, Ranjan R, et al: Intravenous
lidocaine suppresses fentanyl-induced coughing: A
double-blind, prospective, randomized placebo-
controlled study. Anesth Analg 99:1696–1698, 2004.
29. Kundra P, Kutralam S, Ravishankar M: Local anaes-
thesia for awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 44:511–516, 2000.
30. Larson CP Jr: Laryngospasm—the best treatment.
Anesthesiology 89:1293–1294, 1998.
31. Bein B, Carstensen S, Gleim M, et al: A comparison
of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, the laryngeal
tube S and the oesophageal-tracheal Combitube
during routine surgical procedures. Eur J Anaesthe-
siol 22:341–346, 2005.
32. Asai T, Brimacombe J: Cuff volume and size selec-
tion with the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 55:1179–
1184, 2000.
33. McHardy FE, Chung F: Postoperative sore throat:
Cause, prevention and treatment. Anaesthesia
54:444–453, 1999.
34. Siddik-Sayyid SM, Aouad MT, Taha SK, et al: A
comparison of sevoflurane-propofol versus sevoflu-
rane or propofol for laryngeal mask airway inser-
tion in adults. Anesth Analg 100:1204–1209, 2005.
35. Hui JK, Critchley LA, Karmakar MK, Lam PK: Co-
administration of alfentanil-propofol improves
laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to fen-
tanyl-propofol. Can J Anaesth 49:508–512, 2002.
36. Joshi S, Sciacca RR, Solanki DR, et al: A prospective
evaluation of clinical tests for placement of laryngeal
mask airways. Anesthesiology 89:1141–1146, 1998.
37. Brimacombe JR: Anatomy.In Brimacombe JR (ed):
Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia, 2nd ed. Philadelphia,
WB Saunders, 2005, pp 73–104.
38. Reissmann H, Pothmann W, Fullekrug B, et al:
Resistance of laryngeal mask airway and tracheal
tube inmechanically ventilated patients.Br JAnaesth
85:410–416, 2000.
39. Hern JD, Jayaraj SM, Sidhu VS, et al: The laryngeal
mask airway in tonsillectomy: The surgeon’s pers-
pective. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24:122–125,
1999.
40. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Bittersohl J, et al: Aspira-
tion and the laryngeal mask airway.Three cases and
a review of the literature. Br J Anaesth 93:579–582,
2004.
41. Cooper RM: The LMA, laparoscopic surgery and
the obese patient—can vs should. Can J Anaesth
50:5–10, 2003.
42. Tanaka A, Isono S, Ishikawa T, Nishino T: Laryngeal
reflex before and after placement of airway inter-
ventions: Endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask
airway. Anesthesiology 102:20–25, 2005.
43. Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, et al: Mana-
gement of the difficult airway: A closed claims
analysis. Anesthesiology 103:33–39, 2005.