Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  2661 / 2894 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 2661 / 2894 Next Page
Page Background

un ensayo clínico de pequeño tamaño advirtió del riesgo de sufrir

complicaciones isquémicas miocárdicas cuando los pacientes con

EPCA son tratados con presión positiva de dos niveles en la vía

respiratoria (BiPAP, un tipo de PSV), en comparación con la CPA

P 131

.

Recientemente, dos metaanálisis han demostrado que tanto la CPAP

como la NIPPV reducen de manera significativa la necesidad de

intubación, pero la CPAP disminuye significativamente la mortali-

dad, mientras que la NIPPV se asocia con una tendencia clara, pero

no significativa, hacia una mejoría de la supervivenci

a 132,133 .

El

mismo metaanálisis no encontró diferencias significativas en cuanto

a complicaciones isquémicas miocárdicas entre la CPAP y la NIPPV.

En general, algunos autores postulan que la CPAP debería ser con-

siderada como el tratamiento de primera elección en los pacientes

con EPCA, porque es menos cara, más sencilla de suministrar e

igual de eficaz que la NIPP

V 133

.

Varios aspectos sobre la ventilación no invasiva de los

pacientes con EPCA siguen sin respuesta: ¿el mecanismo causante

del EPCA (insuficiencia cardíaca diastólica frente a sistólica

) 134

influye sobre la respuesta a la ventilación no invasiva?, ¿hasta qué

punto es aconsejable el uso de CPAP o NIPPV en los pacientes con

infarto agudo de miocardio?, ¿existen diferentes indicaciones para

la CPAP o NIPPV en los subgrupos de estos pacientes? No obs-

tante, en los pacientes hipercápnicos con EPCA podría ser mejor

utilizar la NIPP

V 130 .

Por último, se necesitan más estudios que

investiguen los parámetros óptimos para la administración de

CPAP y NPPV en los pacientes con EPCA.

Bibliografía

1. Tobin MJ, Jubran A, Laghi F: Patient-ventilator inte-

raction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:1059–1063,

2001.

2. Ranieri VM: Optimization of patient-ventilator

interactions: Closed-loop technology to turn the

century. Intensive Care Med 23:936–939, 1997.

3. Davis K Jr, Branson RD, Campbell RS, Porembka

DT: Comparison of volume control and pressure

control ventilation: Is flow waveform the difference?

J Trauma 41:808–814, 1996.

4. Leung P, Jubran A, Tobin MJ: Comparison of assis-

ted ventilator modes on triggering, patient effort,

and dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155:1940–

1948, 1997.

5. Putensen C, Muders T, Varelmann D, Wrigge H: The

impact of spontaneous breathing during mechanical

ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care 12:13–18, 2006.

6. Marini JJ, Capps JS, Culver BH: The inspiratory

work of breathing during assisted mechanical ven-

tilation. Chest 87:612–618, 1985.

7. Ranieri VM, Giuliani R, Mascia L, et al: Patient-

ventilator interaction during acute hypercapnia:

Pressure-support vs. Proportional-assist ventilation.

J Appl Physiol 81:426–436, 1996.

8. Brochard L: Inspiratory pressure support. Eur J

Anaesthesiol 11:29–36, 1994.

9. Younes M: Proportional assist ventilation, a new

approach to ventilatory support: Theory. Am Rev

Respir Dis 145:114–120, 1992.

10. Bonmarchand G, Chevron V, Menard JF, et al:

Effects of pressure ramp slope values on the work

of breathing during pressure support ventilation in

restrictive patients. Crit Care Med 27:715–722,

1999.

11. Parthasarathy S, Jubran A, Tobin MJ: Assessment of

neural inspiratory time in ventilator-supported

patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:546–552,

2000.

12. Giannouli E, Webster K, Roberts D, Younes M: Res-

ponse of ventilator-dependent patients to different

levels of pressure support and proportional assist.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159:1716–1725, 1999.

13. Brochard L: Pressure support level before extuba-

tion. Chest 106:1932, 1994.

14. Younes M, Puddy A, Roberts D, et al: Proportional

assist ventilation: Results of an initial clinical trial.

Am Rev Respir Dis 145:121–129, 1992.

15. Wrigge H, GolischW, Zinserling J, et al: Proportional

assist versus pressure support ventilation: Effects on

breathing pattern and respiratory work of patients

with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Inten-

sive Care Med 25:790–798, 1999.

16. Ranieri VM, Grasso S, Mascia L, et al: Effects of

proportional assist ventilation on inspiratory

muscle effort in patients with chronic obstructive

pulmonary disease and acute respiratory failure.

Anesthesiology 86:79–91, 1997.

17. Younes M, Kun J, Masiowski B, et al: A method for

noninvasive determination of inspiratory resistance

during proportional assist ventilation. Am J Respir

Crit Care Med 163:829–839, 2001.

18. Younes M, Webster K, Kun J, et al: A method for

measuring passive elastance during proportional

assist ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med

164:50–60, 2001.

19. Sinderby C, Beck J, Spahija J, et al: Inspiratory

muscle unloading by neurally adjusted ventilatory

assist during maximal inspiratory efforts in healthy

subjects. Chest 131:711–717, 2007.

20. Sinderby C, Navalesi P, Beck J, et al: Neural control

of mechanical ventilation in respiratory failure. Nat

Med 5:1433–1436, 1999.

21. Rouby JJ, Lu Q, Goldstein I: Selecting the right level

of positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with

acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir

Crit Care Med 165:1182–1186, 2002.

22. Grasso S, Fanelli V, Cafarelli A, et al: Effects of high

versus low positive end-expiratory pressures in

acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir

Crit Care Med 171:1002–1008, 2005.

23. Shekerdemian L, Bohn D: Cardiovascular effects of

mechanical ventilation. Arch Dis Child 80:475–480,

1999.

24. Diebel LN, Myers T, Dulchavsky S: Effects of increa-

sing airway pressure and PEEP on the assessment

of cardiac preload. J Trauma 42:585–590, 1997, dis-

cussion 590-581.

25. Schmitt JM, Vieillard-Baron A, Augarde R, et al:

Positive end-expiratory pressure titration in acute

respiratory distress syndrome patients: Impact on

right ventricular outflow impedance evaluated by

pulmonary artery Doppler flow velocity measure-

ments. Crit Care Med 29:1154–1158, 2001.

26. Naughton MT, Rahman MA, Hara K, et al: Effect of

continuous positive airway pressure on intrathora-

cic and left ventricular transmural pressures in

patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation

91:1725–1731, 1995.

27. Brochard L: Noninvasive ventilation for acute res-

piratory failure. JAMA 288:932–935, 2002.

28. Mehta S, Hill NS: Noninvasive ventilation. Am J

Respir Crit Care Med 163:540–577, 2001.

29. International consensus conferences in intensive

care medicine: Noninvasive positive pressure venti-

lation in acute respiratory failure. Organized jointly

by the American Thoracic Society, the European

Respiratory Society, the European Society of Inten-

sive Care Medicine, and the Société de Reanimation

de Langue Française, and approved by the ATS

board of directors, December 2000. 2001, pp

283-291.

30. Confalonieri M, Potena A, Carbone G, et al: Acute

respiratory failure in patients with severe commu-

nity-acquired pneumonia: A prospective randomi-

zed evaluation of noninvasive ventilation. Am J

Respir Crit Care Med 160:1585–1591, 1999.

31. Antonelli M, Conti G, Rocco M, et al: A comparison

of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and

conventional mechanical ventilation in patients

with acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 339:

429–435, 1998.

32. Delclaux C, L’Her E, Alberti C, et al: Treatment of

acute hypoxemic nonhypercapnic respiratory

insufficiency with continuous positive airway pres-

sure delivered by a face mask: A randomized con-

trolled trial. JAMA 284:2352–2360, 2000.

33. Girou E, Schortgen F, Delclaux C, et al: Association

of noninvasive ventilation with nosocomial infec-

tions and survival in critically ill patients. JAMA

284:2361–2367, 2000.

34. Nava S, Ambrosino N, Clini E, et al: Noninvasive

mechanical ventilation in the weaning of patients

with respiratory failure due to chronic obstructive

pulmonary disease: A randomized, controlled trial.

Ann Intern Med 128:721–728, 1998.

35. Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson ND, et al:

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for respi-

ratory failure after extubation. N Engl J Med 350:

2452–2460, 2004.

36. Antonelli M, Conti G, Riccioni L, Meduri GU:

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation via face

mask during bronchoscopy with BAL in high-risk

hypoxemic patients. Chest 110:724–728, 1996.

37. Shee CD, Green M: Non-invasive ventilation and

palliation: Experience in a district general hospital

and a review. Palliat Med 17:21–26, 2003.

38. Schettino G, Altobelli N, Kacmarek RM: Noninva-

sive positive-pressure ventilation in acute respira-

tory failure outside clinical trials: Experience at the

Massachusetts General Hospital. Crit Care Med

36:441–447, 2008.

39. Antro C, Merico F, Urbino R, Gai V: Non-invasive

ventilation as a first-line treatment for acute respi-

ratory failure: “Real life” experience in the emer-

gency department. Emerg Med J 22:772–777, 2005.

40. Antonelli M, Conti G, Moro ML, et al: Predictors of

failure of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation

in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure:

A multi-center study. Intensive Care Med 27:1718–

1728, 2001.

41. Cavaliere F, Conti G, Costa R, et al: Noise exposure

during noninvasive ventilation with a helmet, a

Asistencia respiratoria

2661

83

Seccíón VII

Cuidados críticos

© ELSEVIER. Fotocopiar sin autorización es un delito