Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  2734 / 2894 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 2734 / 2894 Next Page
Page Background

10. Cole L, Bellomo R, Davenport P, et al: Cytokine

removal during continuous renal replacement

therapy: An ex vivo comparison of convection and

diffusion. Int J Artif Organs 27:388-397, 2004.

11. Ricci Z, Ronco C, Bachetoni A, et al: Solute removal

during continuous renal replacement therapy in cri-

tically ill patients: Convection versus diffusion. Crit

Care 10:R67, 2006.

12. Ricci Z, Bellomo R, Ronco C: Dose of dialysis in acute

renal failure. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1:380-388,

2006.

13. Eknoyan G, Levin N: NKF-K/DOQI clinical practice

guidelines: update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 38:917,

2001.

14. Arabed G, Knoyan E, Erald G, et al: Effect of dialysis

dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialy-

sis. N Engl J Med 347:2010-2019, 2002.

15. Ricci Z, Salvatori G, Bonello M, et al: In vivo valida-

tion of the adequacy calculator for continuous renal

replacement therapies. Crit Care 9:R266-R273,

2005.

16. Brause M, Nuemann A, Schumacher T, et al: Effect of

filtration volume of continuous venovenous hemofil-

tration in the treatment of patients with acute renal

failure in intensive care units. Crit Care Med 31:841-

846, 2003.

17. Paganini EP, Tapolyai M, Goormastic M, et al: Esta-

blishing a dialysis therapy/patient outcome link in

intensive care unit: Acute dialysis for patients with

acute renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 28(Suppl 3)S81-

S89, 1996.

18. SchifflH, Lang SM, Fischer R: Daily hemodialysis and

the outcome of acute renal failure. N Engl J Med

346:305-310, 2002.

19. Ronco C, Bellomo R, Homel P, et al: Effects of diffe-

rent doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltra-

tion on outcomes of acute renal failure: A prospective

randomised trial. Lancet 356:26-30, 2000.

20. Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, et al: Continuous

renal replacement therapy: A worldwide practice

survey: The Beginning and Ending Supportive

Therapy for the Kidney (B.E.S.T. Kidney) Investiga-

tors. Intensive Care Med 33:1563-1570, 2007.

21. Bouman C, Oudemans-van Straaten H, Tijssen J, et al:

Effects of early high-volume continuous veno-venous

hemofiltration on survival and recovery of renal

function in intensive care patients with acute renal

failure: A prospective randomized trial. Crit Care

Med 30:2205-2211, 2002.

22. Saudan P, Niederberger M, De Seigneux S, et al:

Adding a dialysis dose to continuous hemofiltration

increases survival in patients with acute renal failure.

Kidney Int 70:1312-1317, 2006.

23. Kellum JA: Renal replacement therapy in critically ill

patients with acute renal failure: Does a greater dose

improve survival? Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 3:128-129,

2007.

24. Uchino S, Fealy N, Baldwin I, et al: Continuous is not

continuous: The incidence and impact of circuit

“down-time” on uraemic control during continuous

veno-venous haemofiltration. Intensive Care Med

29:575-578, 2003.

25. Evanson JA, Himmelfarb J, Wingard R, et al: Prescri-

bed versus delivered dialysis in acute renal failure

patients. Am J Kidney Dis 32:731-738, 1998.

26. Venkataraman R, Kellum JA, Palevsky P: Dosing pat-

terns for CRRT at a large academic medical center in

the United States. J Crit Care 17:246-250, 2002.

27. Clark WR, Mueller BA, Kraus MA, Macias WL:

Renal replacement quantification in acute renal

failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13(Suppl 6)86-90,

1998.

28. Dellinger PR, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al: Surviving

Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of

severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 32:858-

873, 2004.

29. Mehta RL, McDonald B, Gabbai FB, et al: A randomi-

zed clinical trial of continuous versus intermittent

dialysis for acute renal failure. Kidney Int 60:1154-

1163, 2001.

30. Vinsonneau C, Camus C, Combes A, et al: Conti-

nuous venovenous haemodiafiltration versus inter-

mittent haemodialysis for acute renal failure in

patients with multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome:

A multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 29:379-385,

2006.

31. Kellum J, Palevsky PM: Renal support in acute kidney

injury. Lancet 29:344-345, 2006.

32. Guerin C, Girard R, Selli JM, Ayzac L: Intermittent

versus continuous renal replacement therapy for

acute renal failure in intensive care units: Results from

a multicenter prospective epidemiological survey.

Intensive Care Med 28:1411-1418, 2002.

33. Uehlinger DE, Jakob SM, Ferrari P, et al: Comparison

of continuous and intermittent renal replacement

therapy for acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Trans-

plant 20:1630-1637, 2005.

34. Schortgen F, Soubrier N, Delclaux C, et al: Hemody-

namic tolerance of intermittent hemodialysis in

critically ill patients: usefulness of practice guideli-

nes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:197-202, 2000.

35. Butler R, Keenan SP, Inman KJ, et al: Is there a prefe-

rred technique for weaning the difficult-to-wean

patient? A systematic review of the literature. Crit

Care Med 27:2331-2336, 1999.

36. Marshall MR, Golper TA, Shaver MJ, et al: Urea kine-

tics during sustained low efficiency dialysis in critica-

lly ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy.

Am J Kidney Dis 39:556-570, 2002.

37. Naka T, Baldwin I, Bellomo R, et al. Prolonged daily

intermittent renal replacement therapy in ICU

patients by ICU nurses and ICU physicians. Int J Artif

Organs 27:380-387.

38. Kumar VA, CraigM, Depner T, Yeun JY: Extended daily

dialysis: A new approach to renal replacement for acute

renal failure in the intensive care unit. Am J Kidney Dis

36:294-300, 2000.

39. Kielstein JT, Kretschmer U, Ernst T, et al: Efficacy and

cardiovascular tolerability of extended dialysis in cri-

tically ill patients: A randomized controlled study. Am

J Kidney Dis 43:342-349, 2004.

40. Baldwin I, Naka T, Koch B, et al: A pilot randomised

controlled comparison of continuous veno-venous

haemofiltration and extended daily dialysis with fil-

tration: Effect on small solutes and acid-base balance.

Intensive Care Med 33:830-835, 2007.

41. Bellomo R, Baldwin I, Ronco C: High-volume hemo-

filtration. Contrib Nephrol 132:375-382, 2001.

42. Morgera S, Haase M, Kuss T, et al: Pilot study on the

effects of high cutoff hemofiltration on the need for

norepinephrine in septic patients with acute renal

failure. Crit Care Med 34:2099-2104, 2006.

43. Tan HK, Baldwin I, Bedllomo R: Continuous veno-

venous hemofiltration without anticoagulation in

high-risk patients. Intensive Care Med 26:1652-1657,

2000.

44. Fiaccadori E, Maggiore U, Rotelli C, et al: Continuous

haemofiltration in acute renal failure with prostacy-

clin as the sole anti-haemostatic agent. Intensive Care

Med 28:586-593, 2002.

45. Kutsogiannis DJ, Gibney N, Stollery D, Gao J: Regio-

nal citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for

continuous renal replacement in critically ill patients.

Kidney Int 67:2361-2367, 2005.

46. Monchi M, Berghmans D, Ledoux D, et al: Citrate vs.

heparin for anticoagulation in continuous venove-

nous hemofiltration: A prospective randomized study.

Intensive Care Med 30:260-265, 2004.

47. Groodendorst AF: High volume hemofiltration impro-

ves haemodynamics of endotoxin-induced shock in

the pig. J Crit Care 7:67-75, 1992.

48. Rogiers P: Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration

improves cardiac performance by mechanism other

then tumor necrosis factor alpha attenuation during

endotoxic shock. Crit Care Med 27:1848-1855,

1999.

49. Bellomo R: The effect of intensive plasma water

exchange by hemofiltration on haemodynamics and

soluble mediators in canine endotoxemia. Am J

Respir Crit Care Med 161:1429-1436, 2000.

50. Lonneman G: Tumor necrosis factor alpha during

continuous high-flux hemodialysis in sepsis with

acute renal failure. Kidney Int 56:S84-S87, 1999.

51. Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Bosman RJ, van der

Spoel JI, Zandstra DF: Outcome of critically ill

patients treated with high volume hemofiltration: A

prospective cohort analysis. Intensive Care Med

25:814-821, 1999.

52. Honore PM, Jamez J, Wauthier M, et al: Prospective

evaluation of short-term, high volume isovolemic

hemofiltration on the hemodynamic course and

outcome in patients with intractable circulatory

failure resulting from septic shock. Crit Care Med

28:3581-3587, 2000.

53. Cole L, Bellomo R, Journois D, et al. High-volume

hemofiltration in human septic shock: Intensive Care

Med 27:978-986, 2001.

54. Cole L, Bellomo R, Hart G, et al: A phase II randomi-

zed, controlled trial of continuous hemofiltration in

sepsis. Crit Care Med 30:100-106, 2002.

55. Ronco C, Brendolan A, Lonnemann G, et al: A pilot

study of coupled plasma filtration with adsorption

in septic shock. Crit Care Med 30:1250-1255,

2002.

56. Formica M, Olivieri C, Livigni S, et al: Hemodynamic

response to coupled plasma filtration-adsorption in

human septic shock. Intensive Care Med 29:703-708,

2003.

57. Leyh RG, Bartels C, Joubert-Hubner E, et al: Influence

of modified ultrafiltration on coagulation, fibrinolysis

and blood loss in adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardio-

thorac Surg 19:145-151, 2001.

58. Onoe M, Magara T, Yamamoto Y, Nojima T: Modified

ultrafiltration removes serum interleukin-8 in adult

cardiac surgery. Perfusion 16:37-42, 2001.

59. Blanchard N, Toque Y, Trojette F, et al: Hemodynamic

and echocardiographic effects of hemofiltration per-

formed during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiotho-

rac Vasc Anesth 14:393-398, 2000.

60. Boga M, Islamoglu, Badak I, et al: The effects of

modified hemofiltration on inflammatory mediators

and cardiac performance in coronary artery bypass

grafting. Perfusion 15:143-150, 2000.

61. Grunenfelder J, Zund G, Schoeberlein A, et al: Modi-

fied ultrafiltration lowers adhesion molecule and

cytokine levels after cardiopulmonary bypass without

clinical relevance in adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

17:77-83, 2000.

62. Van Norman GA, Patel MA, Chandler W, Vocelka C:

Effects of hemofiltration on serum aprotinin levels in

patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. J Car-

diothorac Vasc Anesth 14:253-256, 2000.

63. Tassani P, Richter JA, Eising GP, et al: Influence of

combined zero-balanced and modified ultrafiltration

on the systemic inflammatory response during coro-

nary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc

Anesth 13:285-291, 1999.

64. Babka RM, Petress J, Briggs R, et al: Conventional

haemofiltration during routine coronary bypass

surgery. Perfusion 12:187-192, 1997.

65. Despotis GJ, Levine V, Filos KS, et al: Hemofiltration

during cardiopulmonary bypass: The effect on anti-Xa

2734

Cuidados críticos

VII