44. Davis JW, Shackford SR, Mackersie RC, Hoyt DB: Base
deficit as a guide to volume resuscitation. J Trauma
28:1464–1467, 1988.
45. Davis JW, Kaups KL, Parks SN: Base deficit is superior
to pH in evaluating clearance of acidosis after trau-
matic shock. J Trauma 44:114–118, 1998.
46. Englehart MS, Schreiber MA: Measurement of acid-
base resuscitation endpoints: Lactate, base deficit,
bicarbonate or what? Curr Opin Crit Care 12:569–
574, 2006.
47. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Shoemaker WC, et al:
Endpoints of resuscitation of critically injured
patients: Normal or supranormal? A prospective ran-
domized trial. Ann Surg 232:409–418, 2000.
48. Gattinoni L, Brazzi L, Pelosi P, et al: A trial of goal-
oriented hemodynamic therapy in critically ill
patients. Sv¯O2 Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med
333:1025–1032, 1995.
49. McKinley BA, Kozar RA, Cocanour CS, et al: Normal
versus supranormal oxygen delivery goals in shock
resuscitation: The response is the same. J Trauma
53:825–832, 2002.
50. Marx G, Reinhart K: Venous oximetry. Curr Opin Crit
Care 12:263–268, 2006.
51. Chawla LS, Zia H, Gutierrez G, et al: Lack of equiva-
lence between central and mixed venous oxygen satu-
ration. Chest 126:1891–1896, 2004.
52. Dueck MH, Klimek M, Appenrodt S, et al: Trends but
not individual values of central venous oxygen satu-
ration agree with mixed venous oxygen saturation
during varying hemodynamic conditions. Anesthe-
siology 103:249–257, 2005.
53. Yeager MP, Spence BC: Perioperative fluid manage-
ment: Current consensus and controversies. Semin
Dial 19:472–479, 2006.
54. Yogendran S, Asokumar B, Cheng DC, Chung F: A
prospective randomized double-blinded study of the
effect of intravenous fluid therapy on adverse outcomes
on outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 80:682–686, 1995.
55. Holte K, Klarskov B, Christensen DS, et al: Liberal
versus restrictive fluid administration to improve
recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A ran-
domized, double-blind study. Ann Surg 240:892–899,
2004.
56. Sear JW: Kidney dysfunction in the postoperative
period. Br J Anaesth 95:20–32, 2005.
57. Moller AM, Pedersen T, Svendsen PE, Engquist A:
Perioperative risk factors in elective pneumonectomy:
The impact of excess fluid balance. Eur J Anaesthesiol
19:57–62, 2002.
58. Lobo DN, Bostock KA, Neal KR, et al: Effect of salt
and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal
function after elective colonic resection: A randomi-
sed controlled trial. Lancet 359:1812–1818, 2002.
59. Holte K, Kehlet H: Fluid therapy and surgical outco-
mes in elective surgery: A need for reassessment in
fast-track surgery. J Am Coll Surg 202:971–989, 2006.
60. MacKay G, Fearon K, McConnachie A, et al: Rando-
mized clinical trial of the effect of postoperative
intravenous fluid restriction on recovery after elec-
tive colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 93:1469–1474,
2006.
61. Shoemaker WC, Montgomery ES, Kaplan E, Elwyn
DH: Physiologic patterns in surviving and nonsur-
viving shock patients: Use of sequential cardiorespi-
ratory variables in defining criteria for therapeutic
goals and early warning of death. Arch Surg
106:630–636, 1973.
62. Noblett SE, Snowden CP, Shenton BK, Horgan AF:
Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of
Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome
after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 93:1069–
1076, 2006.
63. Bendjelid K, Romand JA: Fluid responsiveness in
mechanically ventilated patients: A review of indices
used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 29:352–
360, 2003.
64. Jacob M, Chappell D, RehmM: Clinical update: Perio-
perative fluid management. Lancet 369:1984–1986,
2007.
65. Waters JH, Gottlieb A, Schoenwald P, et al: Normal
saline versus lactated Ringer’s solution for intraope-
rative fluid management in patients undergoing
abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: An outcome study.
Anesth Analg 93:817–822, 2001.
66. Dubick MA, Bruttig SP, Wade CE: Issues of concern
regarding the use of hypertonic/hyperoncotic fluid
resuscitation of hemorrhagic hypotension. Shock
25:321–328, 2006.
67. Bunn F, Roberts I, Tasker R, Akpa E: Hypertonic
versus near isotonic crystalloid for fluid resuscitation
in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(3):CD002045, 2004.
68. Jungheinrich C, Neff TA: Pharmacokinetics of
hydroxyethyl starch. Clin Pharmacokinet 44:681–699,
2005.
69. Madjdpour C, Dettori N, Frascarolo P, et al: Molecular
weight of hydroxyethyl starch: Is there an effect on
blood coagulation and pharmacokinetics? Br J
Anaesth 94:569–576, 2005.
70. Kozek-Langenecker SA: Effects of hydroxyethyl
starch solutions on hemostasis. Anesthesiology
103:654–660, 2005.
71. Huraux C, Ankri AA, Eyraud D, et al: Hemostatic
changes in patients receiving hydroxyethyl starch: The
influence of ABO blood group. Anesth Analg
92:1396–1401, 2001.
72. de Jonge E, Levi M: Effects of different plasma subs-
titutes on blood coagulation: A comparative review.
Crit Care Med 29:1261–1267, 2001.
73. Niemi TT, Suojaranta-Ylinen RT, Kukkonen SI, Kui-
tunen AH: Gelatin and hydroxyethyl starch, but not
albumin, impair hemostasis after cardiac surgery.
Anesth Analg 102:998–1006, 2006.
74. Laxenaire MC, Charpentier C, Feldman L: [Ana-
phylactoid reactions to colloid plasma substitutes:
incidence, risk factors, mechanisms. A French multi-
center prospective study]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim
13:301–310, 1994.
75. Goldwasser P, Feldman J: Association of serum
albumin and mortality risk. J Clin Epidemiol 50:693–
703, 1997.
76. Alderson P, Bunn F, Lefebvre C, et al: Human albumin
solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in
critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(4):CD001208, 2004.
77. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, et al: A comparison of
albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the inten-
sive care unit. N Engl J Med 350:2247–2256, 2004.
78. Lang K, Boldt J, Suttner S, Haisch G: Colloids versus
crystalloids and tissue oxygen tension in patients
undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg
93:405–409, 2001.
79. Roberts I, Alderson P, Bunn F, et al: Colloids versus
crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill
patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD000567,
2004.
80. O’Connor MF, Roizen MF: Lactate versus chloride:
Which is better? Anesth Analg 93:809–810, 2001.
81. Boldt J: The balanced concept of fluid resuscitation.
Br J Anaesth 99:312–315, 2007.
82. McFarlane C, Lee A: A comparison of Plasma-Lyte
148 and 0.9% saline for intra-operative fluid replace-
ment. Anaesthesia 49:779–781, 1994.
83. Wilkes NJ, Woolf R, Mutch M, et al: The effects of
balanced versus saline-based hetastarch and crysta-
lloid solutions on acid-base and electrolyte status and
gastric mucosal perfusion in elderly surgical patients.
Anesth Analg 93:811–816, 2001.
84. Scheingraber S, Rehm M, Sehmisch C, Finsterer U:
Rapid saline infusion produces hyperchloremic aci-
dosis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery.
Anesthesiology 90:1265–1270, 1999.
85. Gan TJ, Bennett-Guerrero E, Phillips-Bute B, et al:
Hextend, a physiologically balanced plasma expander
for large volume use in major surgery: A randomized
phase III clinical trial. Hextend Study Group. Anesth
Analg 88:992–998, 1999.
86. Loef BG, Epema AH, Smilde TD, et al: Immediate
postoperative renal function deterioration in cardiac
surgical patients predicts in-hospital mortality and
long-term survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 16:195–200,
2005.
87. Bagshaw SM, Mortis G, Doig CJ, et al: One-year mor-
tality in critically ill patients by severity of kidney
dysfunction: A population-based assessment. Am J
Kidney Dis 48:402–409, 2006.
88. Rixen D, Siegel JH: Bench-to-bedside review: Oxygen
debt and its metabolic correlates as quantifiers of the
severity of hemorrhagic and post-traumatic shock.
Crit Care 9:441–453, 2005.
Fluidoterapia intravascular postoperatoria
2569
78
Sección VI
Cuidados postoperatorios
© ELSEVIER. Fotocopiar sin autorización es un delito