Miller Anestesia

placebo-controlled trial. Crit Care Med 27:2346–

2350, 1999.

40. Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O’Connor MF, Hall JB: Daily

interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill

patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl

J Med 342:1471–1477, 2000.

41. Kollef MH, Shapiro SD, Silver P, et al: A randomized,

controlled trial of protocol-directed versus physi-

cian-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Crit Care Med 25:567–574, 1997.

42. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared

with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury

and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. N

Engl J Med 342–1301–1308, 2000.

43. Nazer LH, Chow SL, Moghissi ES: Insulin infusion

protocols for critically ill patients: A highlight of

differences and similarities. Endocr Pract 13:137–

146, 2007.

44. Kelly JL, Hirsch IB, Furnary AP: Implementing an

intravenous insulin protocol in your practice: Prac-

tical advice to overcome clinical, administrative,

and financial barriers. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc

Surg 18:346–358, 2006.

45. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al: Grading quality of

evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ

328:1490, 2004.

46. The periodic health examination: Canadian Task

Force on the Periodic Health Examination. CMAJ

121:1193–1254, 1979.

47. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI: Randomized, con-

trolled trials, observational studies, and the hierar-

chyofresearchdesigns.NEnglJMed342:1887–1892,

2000.

48. McKee M, Britton A, Black N, et al: Methods in

health services research: Interpreting the evidence:

Choosing between randomised and non-randomi-

sed studies. BMJ 319:312–315, 1999.

49. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D: The CONSORT

statement: Revised recommendations for impro-

ving the quality of reports of parallel-group rando-

mized trials. JAMA 285:1987–1991, 2001.

50. Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, et al: Systems for

grading the quality of evidence and the strength of

recommendations. I. Critical appraisal of existing

approaches. The GRADE Working Group. BMC

Health Serv Res 4:38, 2004.

51. SchünemannHJ, Best D, Vist G, Oxman AD: Letters,

numbers, symbols and words: How to communicate

grades of evidence and recommendations. CMAJ

169:677–680, 2003.

52. Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, Smith H Jr: Bias

in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials.

N Engl J Med 309:1358–1361, 1983.

53. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG: Empi-

rical evidence of bias: Dimensions of methodological

quality associated with estimates of treatment effects

in controlled trials. JAMA 273:408–412, 1995.

54. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al: Assessing the

quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blin-

ding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12, 1996.

55. Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, et al: The

Delphi list: A criteria list for quality assessment of

randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic

reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epi-

demiol 51:1235–1241, 1998.

56. Cochrane WG: The combination of estimates from

different experiments. Biometrics 10:101–129, 1954.

57. Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M: Publication and

related bias in meta-analysis: Power of statistical

tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epide-

miol 53:1119–1129, 2000.

58. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG:

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ

327:557–560, 2003.

59. Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to tea-

ching the practice of medicine. Evidence-BasedMedi-

cine Working Group. JAMA 268:2420–2425, 1992.

60. Rothwell PM: External validity of randomised con-

trolled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial

apply?”. Lancet 365:82–93, 2005.

61. Cone DC, Lewis RJ: Should this study change my

practice? Acad Emerg Med 10:417–422, 2003.

62. Lohr KN: Rating the strength of scientific evidence:

Relevance for quality improvement programs. Int J

Qual Health Care 16:9–18, 2004.

63. Davis D, O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, et al: Impact

of formal continuing medical education: Do confe-

rences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional

continuing education activities change physician

behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA 282:867–

874, 1999.

64. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K: Effects of

computer-based clinical decision support systems

on physician performance and patient outcomes: A

systematic review. JAMA 280:1339–1346, 1998.

65. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al: Changing

provider behavior: An overviewof systematic reviews

of interventions. Med Care 39:II2–45, 2001.

66. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al: Surviving

Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of

severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med

32:858–873, 2004.

67. Garber AJ, Moghissi ES, Bransome ED Jr, et al: Ame-

rican College of Endocrinology position statement

on inpatient diabetes and metabolic control. Endocr

Pract 10(Suppl 2)4–9, 2004.

68. Krinsley JS: Effect of an intensive glucose manage-

ment protocol on the mortality of critically ill adult

patients. Mayo Clin Proc 79:992–1000, 2004.

69. Wallace EL, Churchill WH, Surgenor DM, et al:

Collection and transfusion of blood and blood

components in the United States, 1992. Transfusion

35:802–812, 1995.

70. Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Pearl RG, et al: The CRIT

Study: Anemia and blood transfusion in the critica-

lly ill—current clinical practice in the United States.

Crit Care Med 32:39–52, 2004.

71. Corwin HL, Krantz SB: Anemia of the critically ill:

“Acute” anemia of chronic disease. Crit Care Med

28:3098–3099, 2000.

72. Corwin HL, Parsonnet KC, Gettinger A: RBC trans-

fusion in the ICU. Is there a reason? Chest 108:767–

771, 1995.

73. Rodriguez RM, Corwin HL, Gettinger A, et al:

Nutritional deficiencies and blunted erythropoietin

response as causes of the anemia of critical illness.

J Crit Care 16:36–41, 2001.

74. Eder AF, Chambers LA: Noninfectious complica-

tions of blood transfusion. Arch Pathol Lab Med

131:708–718, 2007.

75. Twomley KM, Rao SV, Becker RC: Proinflamma-

tory, immunomodulating, and prothrombotic pro-

perties of anemia and red blood cell transfusions. J

Thromb Thrombolysis 21:167–174, 2006.

76. Adams RC, Lundy JS: Anesthesia in cases of poor

surgical risk: Some suggestions for decreasing the

risk. Surg Gynecol Obstet 74:1011–1019, 1942.

77. Vincent JL, Baron JF, Reinhart K, et al: Anemia and

blood transfusion in critically ill patients. JAMA

288:1499–1507, 2002.

78. Smoller BR, Kruskall MS: Phlebotomy for diagnos-

tic laboratory tests in adults: Pattern of use and

effect on transfusion requirements. N Engl J Med

314:1233–1235, 1986.

79. Eng J, Kay PH, Murday AJ, et al: Postoperative auto-

logous transfusion in cardiac surgery: A prospec-

tive, randomised study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

4:595–600, 1990.

80. Goodnough LT, Brecher ME, Kanter MH, AuBu-

chon JP: Transfusion medicine. Second of two

parts—blood conservation. N Engl J Med 340:525–

533, 1999.

81. Henry DA, Moxey AJ, Carless PA: Antifibrinolytic

use for minimizing perioperative allogeneic blood

transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1), 2003.

82. Rebuck JA: Practical considerations when develo-

ping guidelines for managing critical bleeding.

Pharmacotherapy 27:103S–109S, 2007.

83. Dojat M, Brochard L, Lemaire F, Harf A: A

knowledge-based system for assisted ventilation of

patients in intensive care units. Int J Clin Monit

Comput 9:239–250, 1992.

84. East TD, Heermann LK, Bradshaw RL, et al: Efficacy

of computerized decision support for mechanical

ventilation: Results of a prospective multi-center

randomized trial. Proc AMIA Sym:p251–255,

1999.

85. Ely EW, Meade MO, Haponik EF, et al: Mechanical

ventilator weaning protocols driven by nonphysi-

cian health-care professionals: Evidence-based clini-

cal practice guidelines. Chest 120:454S–463S, 2001.

86. Lellouche F, Mancebo J, Jolliet P, et al: A multicenter

randomized trial of computer-driven protocolized

weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir

Crit Care Med 174:894–900, 2006.

87. Burns SM, Earven S, Fisher C, et al: Implementation

of an institutional program to improve clinical and

financial outcomes of mechanically ventilated

patients: One-year outcomes and lessons learned.

Crit Care Med 31:2752–2763, 2003.

88. MacIntyre NR, Cook DJ, Ely EW Jr, et al: Evidence-

based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing

ventilatory support: A collective task force facilita-

ted by the American College of Chest Physicians;

the American Association for Respiratory Care; and

the American College of Critical Care Medicine.

Chest 120:375S–395S, 2001.

89. Ely EW, Baker AM, Dunagan DP, et al: Effect on the

duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying

patients capable of breathing spontaneously. N Engl

J Med 335:1864–1869, 1996.

90. Marelich GP, Murin S, Battistella F, et al: Protocol

weaning of mechanical ventilation in medical and

surgical patients by respiratory care practitioners

and nurses: Effect on weaning time and incidence

of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 118:459–

467, 2000.

91. Brook AD, Ahrens TS, Schaiff R, et al: Effect of a

nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the

duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med

27:2609–2615, 1999.

92. Morris AH: Rational use of computerized protocols

in the intensive care unit. Crit Care 5:249–254, 2001.

93. Vogelzang M, Zijlstra F, Nijsten MW: Design and

implementation of GRIP: A computerized glucose

control system at a surgical intensive care unit.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 5:38, 2005.

94. Clemmer TP: Computers in the ICU: Where we

started and where we are now. J Crit Care 19:201–

207, 2004.

95. Bates DW, Gawande AA: Improving safety with

information technology. N Engl J Med 348:2526–

2534, 2003.

96. Provencio JJ: Lessons from the medical and surgical

ICU. Cleve Clin J Med 71(Suppl 1): S19–S21, 2004.

97. Tisdall MM, Smith M: Multimodal monitoring in

traumatic brain injury: Current status and future

directions. Br J Anaesth 99:61–67, 2007.

98. Barr J, Hecht M, Flavin KE, et al: Outcomes in cri-

tically ill patients before and after the implementa-

tion of an evidence-based nutritional management

protocol. Chest 125:1446–1457, 2004.

99. McMullin J, Brozek J, Jaeschke R, et al: Glycemic

control in the ICU: A multicenter survey. Intensive

Care Med 30:798–803, 2004.

100. Payen JF, Chanques G, Mantz J, et al., Current prac-

tices in sedation and analgesia for mechanically

ventilated critically ill patients: A prospective mul-

ticenter patient-based study. Anesthesiology 106:

687–695; quiz 891–892, 2007.

101. Vincent JL: Give your patient a fast hug (at least)

once a day. Crit Care Med 33:1225–1229, 2005.

Protocolos de cuidados críticos

2643

Sección VII

Cuidados críticos