Tucek S, Michal P, Vlachova V: Modelling the consequen-
ces of receptor–G-protein promiscuity. Trends Phar-
macol Sci 23:171–176, 2002.
Vaughan M: Signaling by heterotrimeric G proteins mini-
review series. J Biol Chem 273:17297, 1998.
Watson J, Gilman M, Witkowski J, et al: Recombinant
DNA, 3rd ed. New York, Scientific American,
2007.
Weinshilboum R: Inheritance and drug response. N Engl
J Med 348:529–537, 2003.
Wilkinson GR: Pharmacokinetics: The dynamics of drug
absorption,distribution,and elimination.InHardman
JG, Limbird LE (eds): The Pharmacological Basis of
Therapeutics, 10th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill,
2002.
Bibliografía
1. Krejcie TC, Avram MJ, Gentry WB, et al: A recircula-
tory model of the pulmonary uptake and pharmaco-
kinetics of lidocaine based on analysis of arterial and
mixed venous data from dogs. J Pharmacokinet
Biopharm 25:169–190, 1997.
2. Shafer S: Principles of pharmacokinetics and pharma-
codynamics.
In
Longnecker DE, Tinker JH, Morgan
GE (eds): Principles and Practice of Anesthesiology,
2nd ed. St Louis, Mosby–Year Book, 1997.
3. Wagner JG: Pharmacokinetics for the Pharmaceutical
Scientist. Lancaster, PA, Technomic Publishing, 1993.
4. Wilkinson GR, Shand DG: Commentary: A physiolo-
gical approach to hepatic drug clearance. Clin Phar-
macol Ther 18:377–390, 1975.
5. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH: Prediction of creatinine
clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41,
1976.
6. Ebling WF, Wada DR, Stanski DR: From piecewise to
full physiologic pharmacokinetic modeling: Applied
to thiopental disposition in the rat. J Pharmacokinet
Biopharm 22:259–292, 1994.
7. Bjorkman S, Wada DR, Stanski DR: Application of
physiologic models to predict the influence of changes
in body composition and blood flows on the pharma-
cokinetics of fentanyl and alfentanil in patients.Anes-
thesiology 88:657–667, 1998.
8. Youngs EJ, Shafer SL: Basic pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic principles.
In
White PF (ed): Text-
book of Intravenous Anesthesia. Baltimore, Williams
& Wilkins, 1997, p 10.
9. Scott JC, Ponganis KV, Stanski DR: EEG quantitation
of narcotic effect: The comparative pharmacodyna-
mics of fentanyl and alfentanil. Anesthesiology
62:234–241, 1985.
10. Mandema JW, Kuck MT, Danhof M: Differences in
intrinsic efficacy of benzodiazepines are reflected in
their concentration-EEG effect relationship. Br J
Pharmacol 105:164–170, 1992.
11. Milano CA, Allen LF, Rockman HA, et al: Enhanced
myocardial function in transgenic mice overexpres-
sing the beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Science 264:582–
586, 1994.
12. Engelhardt S, Grimmer Y, Fan G-H, Lohse MJ: Cons-
titutive activity of the human
b
1
-adrenergic receptor
in
b
1
-receptor transgenic mice. Mol Pharmacol
60:712–717, 2001.
13. Liu X,Callaerts-Vegh Z,Evans KLJ,Bond RA: Chronic
infusion of
b
-adrenoceptor antagonist and inverse
agonists decreases elevated protein kinase A activity
in transgenic mice with cardiac-specific overexpres-
sion of human
b
2
ARs. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
40:448–455, 2002.
14. Stapelfeldt WH: The autonomic nervous system.
In
.
Schwinn DA (ed): Scientific Principles of Anesthesia
vol 2. Philadelphia, Current Medicine, 1998.
15. Berkowitz DE: Cellular signal transduction.
In
.
Schwinn DA (ed). Scientific Principles of Anes-
thesia vol 2. Philadelphia, Current Medicine,
1998.
16. Firestone L, Quinlan J, Gyulai F: Mechanisms of anes-
thetic action.
In
. Schwinn DA (ed): Scientific Princi-
ples of Anesthesia vol 2. Philadelphia, Current
Medicine, 1998.
17. Krasowski MD, Harrison NL: General anaesthetic
actions on ligand-gated ion channels. Cell Mol Life
Sci 55:1278–1303, 1999.
18. Jurd R, Arras M, Lambert S, et al: General anesthetic
actions in vivo strongly attenuated by a point muta-
tion in the GABA(A) receptor beta3 subunit. FASEB
J 17:250–252, 2003.
19. McEwan AI, Smith C, Dyar O, et al: Isoflurane
minimum alveolar concentration reduction by fen-
tanyl. Anesthesiology 78:864–869, 1993.
20. Vuyk J, Lim T, Engbers FH, et al: The pharmacodyna-
mic interaction of propofol and alfentanil during
lower abdominal surgery in women. Anesthesiology
83:8–22, 1995.
21. Hendrickx JFA, Eger EI, Sonner JM, Shafer SL: Is
synergy the rule? A review of anesthetic interactions
producing hypnosis and immobility. Anesth Analg
107:494–506, 2008.
22. Minto CF, Schnider TW, Short TG, et al: Response
surface model for anesthetic drug interactions. Anes-
thesiology 92:1603–1616, 2000.
23. Lamba JK, Lin YS, Thummel K, et al: Common allelic
variants of cytochrome P4503A4 and their prevalence
in different populations. Pharmacogenetics 12:121–
132, 2002.
24. Dai D, Tang J, Rose R, et al: Identification of variants
of CYP3A4 and characterization of their abilities to
metabolize testosterone and chlorpyrifos. J Pharma-
col Exp Ther 299:825–831, 2001.
25. Blaisdell J, Mohrenweiser H, Jackson J, et al: Identifi-
cation and functional characterization of new poten-
tially defective alleles of human CYP2C19.
Pharmacogenetics 12:703–711, 2002.
26. Poulsen L, Brosen K,Arendt-Nielsen L, et al: Codeine
and morphine in extensive and poor metabolizers of
sparteine: Pharmacokinetics, analgesic effect and side
effects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 51:289–295, 1996.
27. Johnson JA, Terra SG:
b
-Adrenergic receptor
polymorphisms: Cardiovascular disease associations
and pharmacogenetics. Pharm Res 19:1779–1787,
2002.
28. Large V, Hellstrom L, Reynisdottir S, et al: Human
beta-2 adrenoceptor gene polymorphisms are highly
frequent in obesity and associate with altered adipo-
cyte beta-2 adrenoceptor function. J Clin Invest
100:3005–3013, 1997.
29. Dishy V, Sofowora GG, Xie HG, et al: The effect of
common polymorphisms of the beta2-adrenergic
receptor on agonist-mediated vascular desensitiza-
tion. N Engl J Med 345:1020–1035, 2002.
30. Israel E: Genetics and the variability of treatment res-
ponse in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 115:S532–
S538, 2005.
31. Homer TD, Stanski DR: The effect of increasing age
on thiopental disposition and anesthetic requirement.
Anesthesiology 62:714–724, 1985.
32. Bell GD, Spickett GP, Reeve PA, et al: Intravenous
midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A
study of 800 consecutive cases relating dose to age
and sex of patient. Br J Clin Pharmacol 23:241–243,
1987.
33. Scott JC, Stanski DR: Decreased fentanyl and alfenta-
nil dose requirements with age.A simultaneous phar-
macokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation. J
Pharmacol Exp Ther 240:159–166, 1987.
34. Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, et al: Influence of
age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and phar-
macodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model develop-
ment. Anesthesiology 86:10–23, 1997.
35. Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, et al: The influence
of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesio-
logy 90:1502–1516, 1999.
36. Bailey DG, Malcolm J, Arnold O, Spence JD: Grape-
fruit juice–drug interactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol
46:101–110, 1998.
Principios básicos de farmacología
279
9
Sección II
Farmacología y anestesia
© ELSEVIER. Fotocopiar sin autorización es un delito